Are Parallel Universes Possible According to M-Theory?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of parallel universes as proposed by M-theory, with a link to a related documentary. Some participants express skepticism about the validity of parallel universes, viewing the idea as more fictional than scientific. Others argue that theoretical cosmologists might create different models that could support the existence of parallel universes, particularly within the framework of 11-dimensional M-theory. The notion of 4-branes existing in a higher-dimensional space is mentioned as a possibility, though it remains speculative without experimental evidence. Overall, the conversation highlights the ongoing debate about the scientific credibility of parallel universes in modern physics.
Nasher
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Here is a link to a parallel universe... documentary.

BBC Horizan - Parallel Universes (44 min 35 sec)
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=4183875433858020781
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Space news on Phys.org
What observation do you have in mind that would prove, or disprove, the 'parallel universe' conjecture? I think it is bad science.
 
I reckon that idea of parallel universes sounds more like fiction that fact.
Of course, since I am not well up in it, that's just my opinion.

Maybe theoretical cosmologists can vary the number of dimensions and other variables, which will yield different universes and parallel universes depending on their models and variables.

When meteorologists were developing computer programs to simulate the weather, depending on their model and variables, they could generate a wide range of results.
 
Last edited:
I think the idea of parallel universes has some credibility in the context of 11 dimensional M-theory, that is, if it turns out to be a valid theory of the universe. It seems conceivable that we could inhabit a 4-brane in a higher dimensional bulk in which it is then quite possible that other 4-branes reside with similar or even identical laws of physics. However this is highly speculative at the moment with no experimental proof of the validity of string / M theory.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top