Parallel Wires and Magnetic Field

AI Thread Summary
Two parallel wires with currents in the same direction exert an attractive magnetic force, causing one wire to move towards the other. While magnetic fields do not perform work on moving charged particles, the magnetic force can still do work on the moving wire itself. The confusion arises from the relationship between force and the motion of charges; since the force is perpendicular to the charge's motion, no work is done on the charges. However, work is indeed done to accelerate the wire sideways, as it moves against its own mass. Ultimately, the work done is related to the movement of the wire rather than the charges within it.
kimberlyann9
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider 2 parallel wires with currents running down them in the same direction. The first is fixed in place unable to move. The second is allowed to move. They exert an attractive magnetic force on one another, and the second wire moves towards the first. The second moves and speeds up; work is done. Magnetic fields do no work on moving charged particles. Is this statement violated in this situation?



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Not really sure. It seems like the magnetic force would be enough to allow the 2nd wire to move, although the field itself does no work, the magnetic force can?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To solve this you have to really look hard at the forces. No work is done on the charges. But that doesn't mean no work is done on the wire.

Work is F.dl. The charges are moving perpendicular to the force, so that's zero. Is there anything that is moving along F?
 
Antiphon said:
To solve this you have to really look hard at the forces. No work is done on the charges. But that doesn't mean no work is done on the wire.

Work is F.dl. The charges are moving perpendicular to the force, so that's zero. Is there anything that is moving along F?

I'm so confused! So F and v are always perpendicular so that is why there cannot be any work done. F=ILB and there is current through the wire so does that have something to do with it?
 
Think of it like this; the charge is moving along the wire but the force is perpendicular to the wire. So the force pulling on the wire (sideways) can't be doing work on the charges along their direction of motion.

That doesn't mean that work isn't being done to accelerate the wire sideways- it is. But the sideways acceleration doesn't do work against the current, it does work against the mass of the wire to accelerate it sideways.

The work goes into moving the wire sideways, not pushing or pulling on the charges along the direction of the wire.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top