Parameterization of Sum of Squares

  • Thread starter Thread starter patrickbotros
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Squares Sum
patrickbotros
Messages
34
Reaction score
1
I've seen the parameterization of a^2+b^2=c^2 and also a^2+b^2=c^2+d^2, but I don't know how they arrived at those parameterizations. Would it be possible to parameterize something with two equalities like a^2+b^2=c^2+d^2=e^2+f^2? Any help is appreciated!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, the idea is the same as for the others. Just add another angle.
 
Orodruin said:
Yes, the idea is the same as for the others. Just add another angle.
How? Specifically how to do the a^2+b^2=c^2+d^2=e^2+f^2
 
Start by parametrising the first equality, then the second. How do you parametrise the first?
 
Orodruin said:
Start by parametrising the first equality, then the second. How do you parametrise the first?
I don't know. That's what I'm asking. I just know what the answer ends up benign. Not the steps.
 
Do you understand why ##a^2 + b^2 = c^2## is parametrised by an angle ##\theta##?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
943
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top