Parametric Equations: Exploring the Power of Analytical Geometry

Noesis
Messages
99
Reaction score
0
I find parametric equations to be simply amazing.

I was wondering if there is a website, or better yet a book that covers them in more detail?

I found it incredible how we can describe circles, ellipses, lines and other analytical geometrical shapes by them...so I wanted to know how deep it goes.

If anyone can point me in some direction I would be very appreciative.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Thanks man.

Yea, google is usually the first thing I check.

I was just interested to see if there was more that I could glean from them. Being able to represent lines, circles, ellipses, and who the hell knows what else with just one variable seemed very interesting and definitely useful.

I'll keep searching.
 
One quite useful parametrization is that of a particle's trajectory curve in space, using time as our parameter. This parametrization is often called the particle's position vector.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top