Parition function for Boson gas with two quantum numbers

dipole
Messages
553
Reaction score
151
Parition function for Boson "gas" with two quantum numbers

Let's say that we have a system of non-interacting Bosons with single-particle energies given by,

\epsilon_{p,m} = \frac{p^2}{2m} + \alpha m

where m = -j, ... ,j

and we want to calculate the partition function of this system. To do this, you would write,

Z_N = \sum_{\{n(\vec{p},m)\}} \exp(-\beta \sum_{\vec{p},m} \epsilon_{p,m}n(\vec{p},m))

Where n(\vec{p},m) are the occupation numbers. From there, you would use the grand cannoncial formalism, and have that,

Q = \sum_{N=0} e^{\beta \mu N} \sum_{\{n(\vec{p},m)\}} \exp(-\beta \sum_{\vec{p},m} \epsilon_{p,m}n(\vec{p},m))

Assuming I haven't made any mistakes yet (and if I have PLEASE point them out!) I'm not sure how to evaluate this when there is double sums involved since, n(\vec{p},m) can certainly be degenerate...

I'm thinking I can just write this as,

Q = \sum_ {\{n(\vec{p},m)\}} \prod_{\vec{p},m} \exp(-\beta(\epsilon_{p,m} - \mu )n(\vec{p},m))

and then proceed as normal, but I'm really not sure... any stat-wizards out there want to help me out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So I think what I wrote above makes sense, so proceeding:

Peform the sum over \{n(\vec{p} ,m)\},
Q = \prod_{\vec{p},m} [ 1 - \exp(-\beta(\epsilon_{p,m} - \mu )) ]^{-1}
and,
\ln (Q) = -\sum_ {\vec{p},m} \ln( 1 - \exp(-\beta(\epsilon_{p,m} - \mu )) )

and so,

\langle n(\vec{p},m) \rangle = \frac{\partial \ln (Q) }{\partial ( \beta \epsilon_{p,m} )} = \frac{1}{z^{-1}e^{\beta\epsilon_{p,m}} - 1}

So we get essentially the same Bose-Einstein distribution, but now the average occupation number depends on both quantum numbers. Feel free to comment if you think this makes sense.
 
Last edited:
Yes it makes sense, but to use the canonical partition function first and then sum over the particle numbers for the grand-canonical one is pretty complicated. It's much simpler you start from the grand-canonical statistical operator right away,
\hat{R}=\frac{1}{Z} \exp[-\beta(\hat{H}-\mu \hat{N})], \quad Z=\mathrm{Tr} \exp[-\beta(\hat{H}-\mu \hat{N})].
Here \hat{N} can be any conserved number (or charge) operator. Then you simply sum over all possible Fock states (occupation-number states) with n(\epsilon_{p,m}) \in \mathbb{N}_0, leading precisely to the result you've given in #2.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top