Parity violation on macroscopic scale

tzimie
Messages
256
Reaction score
27
a question which is bugging me...

Yes, I know that parity is violated only by the Weak Interaction, which is very short range. So I would answer "no, there is no P violation on macroscopic scale"

However, many macroscopic properties are the results of what happens on the microscopic level. So can P violation somehow "leak" into the macroscopic world? Or, If you insist on the answer "No", is there a solid proof that macroscopic world is P symmetric?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tzimie said:
However, many macroscopic properties are the results of what happens on the microscopic level. So can P violation somehow "leak" into the macroscopic world? Or, If you insist on the answer "No", is there a solid proof that macroscopic world is P symmetric?

Any experiment that successfully detects parity violation is an example of leakage into the macroscopic world - the experimental apparatus is macroscopic and behaves differently when parity is violated.

However, you are probably looking for something a bit more exciting than just a few needles reading different values... Like say a big lump of cobalt-60 (google for "Wu experiment parity") blasting gamma radiation and electrons in different directions? There's no reason why such a thing could not in principle be assembled, but the probability of it happening is so low that in practice it will never happen.

Similar considerations apply to even the more prosaic examples of macroscopic properties emerging from what happens on the microscopic level. A macroscopic dropped brick will pretty reliably fall to to the ground - but in principle all the air molecules underneath it might just randomly happen to be moving up at the same time and then it would float. Generally any time that you want to make a connection between microscopic and macroscopic behavior you have to apply the methods of statistical mechanics.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
Some theories to explain the fact that we only observe L-Aminoacids and D-sugars (homochirality) in living beings try to trace this back to the parity violating terms in the hamiltonian. I think that even some experiments in the Rosetta comet landing mission where dedicated to explore this.
See,
http://www.acadeuro.org/fileadmin/user_upload/publications/ER_Symmetry_supplement/Cline.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Interesting, thank you
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top