Parkour for Tall Men: A Risky Endeavor?

  • Thread starter Thread starter driker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Short
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the suitability of parkour for tall men, highlighting concerns about injury risk due to their body mechanics. Taller individuals may find it easier to reach longer distances, which can be an advantage in parkour. However, their increased weight can lead to greater impact on their legs during jumps, raising the likelihood of fractures from falls. The fear of falling is also a significant factor for tall practitioners, with one participant expressing personal apprehension about engaging in parkour due to their height and the associated risks. The conversation references the square-cube law to explain the implications of size on physical performance and injury potential.
driker
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Is parkour suitable for tall men to practice? Will it add larger probability to tall men to get hurt considering taller men has lower bearing surface to body mass ratio?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Isn't anyone interested in this topic? Or doesn't anyone know it?
 
The last applied to me, I had to google it. I think it will be easier if you are tall, as you can more easily reach over longer distances.
 
The taller you are the more easily you can reach over longer distances, but the heavier weight will impact your legs when you jump. I think tall people are more likely to get fratured bones when we falling from a high site. I'm 6'5, and I would avoid to do such things cause I awlays have a terrior of falling.
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top