Partial derivative with chain rule: check work

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
939
Messages
110
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



If possible, please check my work for any large errors.

y = 10kl - √k - √l
k = (t/5) + 5
l = 5e^t/10

Evaluate at t = 0 using chain rule.

Homework Equations



y = 10kl - √k - √l
k = (t/5) + 5
l = 5e^t/10

The Attempt at a Solution



= ∂y/∂k * dk/dt + ∂y/∂l * dl/dt
= (10l - 0.5K^-0.5)(1/5) + (10k - 0.5l^-.05)((e^(x/10))/2)

k(0) = 5
l(0) = 5
y(0) = ~9.95 + ~41.03 = ~51
 
Physics news on Phys.org
939 said:

Homework Statement



If possible, please check my work for any large errors.

y = 10kl - √k - √l
k = (t/5) + 5
l = 5e^t/10

Evaluate at t = 0 using chain rule.

Homework Equations



y = 10kl - √k - √l
k = (t/5) + 5
l = 5e^t/10

The Attempt at a Solution



= ∂y/∂k * dk/dt + ∂y/∂l * dl/dt
= (10l - 0.5K^-0.5)(1/5) + (10k - 0.5l^-.05)((e^(x/10))/2)
The above is close. The -0.5l^(-.05) term should be -0.5l^(-0.5). I don't know if that was a transcription error. Also, the exponential term would be clearer as (1/2)e(x/10).
939 said:
k(0) = 5
l(0) = 5
y(0) = ~9.95 + ~41.03 = ~51
k(0) and l(0) are fine, but I didn't check your other numbers.

One other thing. It's not good to start your first line with "=". For your problem, you should start with dy/dt = ...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person