- #1

- 3

- 0

In James Stewart's

[itex]\frac{\partial P}{\partial V}\frac{\partial V}{\partial T}\frac{\partial T}{\partial P} = -1[/itex]

I can do this by noting that [itex]V = \frac{nRT}{P}[/itex] so that:

[itex]\frac{\partial V}{\partial T}[/itex] = [itex]\frac{\partial}{\partial T}\left(\frac{nRT}{P}\right)[/itex] = [itex]\frac{nR}{P}[/itex]

and then doing likewise to find the other terms.

But this confuses me because I have treated P as a constant like n and R while it is actually a function of T and V. If I make it a function of T and V I get stuck and anyway the thing gets a lot more complicated than the exercise intends. So how can I just treat P as a constant when I know its not?

Thanks for any help, Peter

*Calculus*exercise 82 page 891 asks you to show that:[itex]\frac{\partial P}{\partial V}\frac{\partial V}{\partial T}\frac{\partial T}{\partial P} = -1[/itex]

I can do this by noting that [itex]V = \frac{nRT}{P}[/itex] so that:

[itex]\frac{\partial V}{\partial T}[/itex] = [itex]\frac{\partial}{\partial T}\left(\frac{nRT}{P}\right)[/itex] = [itex]\frac{nR}{P}[/itex]

and then doing likewise to find the other terms.

But this confuses me because I have treated P as a constant like n and R while it is actually a function of T and V. If I make it a function of T and V I get stuck and anyway the thing gets a lot more complicated than the exercise intends. So how can I just treat P as a constant when I know its not?

Thanks for any help, Peter

Last edited: