What is fx(0,1) in Partial Differentiation for f(x,y)=2e^(x^2y)?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the partial derivative fx(0,1) for the function f(x,y)=2e^(x^2y). Initially, the calculation incorrectly suggested that fx(0,1) equals 1, but it was clarified that when applying the chain rule and treating y as a constant, the correct derivative is fx = 4xye^(x^2y). Substituting x=0 and y=1 results in fx(0,1) = 0, due to the multiplication by zero. The participants recognized the error in the initial calculation and confirmed the correct approach through collaborative discussion. Ultimately, the correct answer for fx(0,1) is 0.
Mitchtwitchita
Messages
187
Reaction score
0
f(x,y)=2e^(x^2y), then fx(0,1) = ?

fx = 4xye^(x^2y)
=4(0)(1)e^(0)(1)
=e^0
=1?

I'm told that I'm getting this question wrong but don't know how. Can anybody please help show me what I'm doing wrong on this one?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You are doing partial differentiation with respect to x, so you can treat y as a constant.

It's just simply using the chain rule and (e^x)' = e^x.

If you do that correctly you should get up to 2 \cdot ( 2y \cdot x^{2y-1} ) \exp (x^{2y}).

The x term is a nice fat zero, giving the final result of 0.
 
Crap! I see now. Thanks Gib.
 
Mitchtwitchita said:
f(x,y)=2e^(x^2y), then fx(0,1) = ?

fx = 4xye^(x^2y)
=4(0)(1)e^(0)(1)
=e^0
=1?

I'm told that I'm getting this question wrong but don't know how. Can anybody please help show me what I'm doing wrong on this one?
Is that
2e^{x^{2y}}
as Gib Z assumed or
2e^{x^2y}
which is what I would assume?
If it is the latter then
f_x= 4xye^{x^2y}
as you have. Then f_x(0,1)= 4(0)(1)e^{(0)(1)}= 0, not 1, because of the "0" multiplying the exponential.
 
Damn i just realized that :( Looking at his working it looks like you're right Halls =] Sorry guys.
 
It was the latter. But I realized what I was doing wrong from Gib's reply. Thanks guys!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top