Partial pressure and liquid water

AI Thread Summary
Liquid water on Mars can exist if the temperature exceeds 273 K and the partial pressure of water vapor is above 611 Pa, not just the total atmospheric pressure. In scenarios where ice is present and the atmospheric pressure is 1000 Pa with a temperature increase from 270 K to 280 K, the ice will sublimate into vapor unless the partial pressure of water vapor is sufficiently high. If the partial pressure of water vapor rises above 611 Pa while the temperature is above 273 K, the ice can melt instead of sublimating. The phase behavior of water is significantly influenced by the vapor pressure relative to the partial pressure of water vapor in the atmosphere. Understanding these relationships is crucial for assessing the potential for liquid water on Mars.
jf22901
Messages
55
Reaction score
1
Hi everyone

I'm reading up on the possibility of liquid water existing on the surface of Mars, and have confused myself!

During my reading, I have come across various definitions that say liquid water can exist if the temperature is above 273 K and the atmospheric pressure is above 611 Pa, but others say it is the partial pressure of water vapour that needs to be above 611 Pa.

As an example, say there is an ice deposit on Mars in a region where the atmospheric pressure is 1000 Pa, and the temperature increases from 270 K to 280 K. What happens in this case? Does the ice turn to liquid or sublime to vapour? The temperature and atmospheric pressure are high enough for liquid water to exist, but how does the partial pressure of water vapour come into things in this situation?

I must be missing something blindingly obvious, but I can't see what it is!

Thanks,

Jack
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jf22901 said:
During my reading, I have come across various definitions that say liquid water can exist if the temperature is above 273 K and the atmospheric pressure is above 611 Pa, but others say it is the partial pressure of water vapour that needs to be above 611 Pa.

The second statement is correct. Condensed matter (solid or liquid) will sublimate or evaporate if the vapor pressure is higher than the partial pressure in the gas phase. The vapor pressure of water at 273 K is 611 Pa, so any liquid water would evaporate unless the partial pressure of water vapor in the gas phase were at least 611 Pa.

jf22901 said:
As an example, say there is an ice deposit on Mars in a region where the atmospheric pressure is 1000 Pa, and the temperature increases from 270 K to 280 K. What happens in this case? Does the ice turn to liquid or sublime to vapour? The temperature and atmospheric pressure are high enough for liquid water to exist, but how does the partial pressure of water vapour come into things in this situation?

The ice will sublimate into vapor. See the phase diagram http://www.colorado.edu/physics/phys4230/phys4230_sp03/images/phase.gif" , keeping in mind that the pressure is that of the water vapor, not the total pressure.

Also, if the original atmospheric pressure (at 270 K) did not include at least ~600 Pa of water vapor partial pressure, the ice would be sublimating already. Does this make sense?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mapes said:
The ice will sublimate into vapor. See the phase diagram http://www.colorado.edu/physics/phys4230/phys4230_sp03/images/phase.gif" , keeping in mind that the pressure is that of the water vapor, not the total pressure.

Also, if the original atmospheric pressure (at 270 K) did not include at least ~600 Pa of water vapor partial pressure, the ice would be sublimating already. Does this make sense?

Hi Mapes

Thanks for the reply. I think it makes sense now, but let me just try another example to make sure I have actually understood it! It's strange that I am comfortable with what what might be classed as 'difficult' physics topics (such as quantum mechanics, electromagnetism, calculus of variations etc.), but thermodynamics confuses the heck out of me! :blushing:

Right... let's say there is a block of ice on Mars, the pressure of the atmosphere is 106 Pa, and the temperature rises from 200 - 350 K (in no way realistic, but it'll do as an example, as it is easier to follow on the phase diagram!). Let's also assume the partial pressure due to water vapour in the atmosphere is less than 611 Pa. In this case, although the total atmospheric pressure falls above the triple point, because the partial pressure is below, the ice will sublime directly to vapour as the temperature increases.

But, as the vapour enters the atmosphere, the atmosphere (at least the thin layer close to the block of ice) will become more saturated with vapour, and in this small layer, the partial pressure of the water vapour may increase to above 611 Pa. In such a situation, with the temperature above 273 K (but below the boiling temperature), and the partial pressure due to vapour now above 611 Pa, would the ice begin to melt rather than sublime?

And if it did melt, the liquid would be stable against freezing and boiling, but not necessarily evaporation, unless the air was completely saturated with water vapour?

Thanks once again, :biggrin:

Jack
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes, this reasoning looks good.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top