Partial Pressure of O2: 99.3 KPa at 25°C & Water

  • Thread starter Thread starter fatima_a
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Partial
AI Thread Summary
To find the partial pressure of oxygen gas collected over water at 25°C with an atmospheric pressure of 99.3 KPa, the vapor pressure of water at this temperature must be considered. At 25°C, the vapor pressure of water is approximately 3.17 kPa. Using the formula P total = P O2 + P H2O, the partial pressure of O2 can be calculated as P O2 = P total - P H2O, resulting in P O2 = 99.3 kPa - 3.17 kPa, which equals 96.13 kPa. Converting this to mmHg, the partial pressure of O2 is approximately 721 mmHg. Understanding vapor pressure is crucial for accurate calculations in gas collection scenarios.
fatima_a
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
what is the partial pressure of oxygen gas. if it is collected over water at 25 degrees celcius and an atmospheric pressure of 99.3 KPa. answer in mmHg

okay i know the formula for partial pressures is

P total = P O2 + P H2O

but there is no other info given like the volume or anything so i am lost. please answer by tomorrow. and show all the steps. i have a quiz the day after
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There should be a discussion of how H20 pressure varies with temperature, either in your textbook or class lecture notes. You might try looking up "vapor pressure" or "pressure, vapor" in the index of your textbook.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top