Partial Pressure Problem: Calculating Remaining Reactant using Avogadro's Law

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the remaining partial pressure of ethylamine during its decomposition, start with the initial pressure of 55 mm Hg and use the total pressure readings at various times. The increase in total pressure indicates the formation of products, ethane and ammonia, which can be related to the stoichiometry of the reaction. By applying Avogadro's Law, the change in total pressure can be used to determine the moles of products formed and, consequently, the remaining moles of ethylamine. This approach allows for the calculation of the partial pressure of the reactant at any given time.
elliotyang
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
The gas phase decomposition of ethylamine produces ethane and ammonia according to the following equation:-

C2H5NH2 (g) → C2H4 (g) + NH3 (g)

The following total pressures were found for this reaction at 500°C with an initial pressure of pure ethylamine equal to 55 mm Hg.

Ptotal (mm Hg) time (min)
55 0

64 2

72 4

89 10

93 12


If P0 is the initial pressure of reactant and ptotal is the total pressure at time t, show how the the partial pressure of reactant remaining at time t can be found.

Can anyone give hint to me how to start to solve this question?

is it i have to apply avogadro's law?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
elliotyang said:
is it i have to apply avogadro's law?

That, plus stoichiometry.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top