Partial RL Circuit: Solving for Current in Inductor with Kirchhoff's Rules

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving for the current in an inductor using Kirchhoff's rules in a partial RL circuit. The current pulse reaches a maximum of 7.0 A for 200 µs, after which it returns to zero. The correct equation for the current during the pulse is I(t) = 7(1 - e^{-100000t}) for 0 ≤ t ≤ 200 µs. For t > 200 µs, the user struggles with the differential equation L(dI3/dt) = -I2*R and the continuity condition to find the current in the inductor. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in applying Kirchhoff's rules and solving the differential equations correctly.
Ithryndil
Messages
142
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A current pulse is fed to the partial circuit shown in Figure P32.25. The current begins at zero, then becomes Imax = 7.0 A between t = 0 and t = 200 µs, and then is zero once again. Determine the current in the inductor as a function of time. Let L = 1.0 mH and R = 100 . (Use t as appropriate.) Figure

Homework Equations


...

The Attempt at a Solution



I know I need to use Kirchhoff's rules for this. I am not quite sure how to go about setting this up...I know I will have:

Emf - IR - L(dI/dt) = 0

Since there is no Emf this becomes:
L(dI/dt) = - IR

I am not sure where to go from here. I have the correct answer for 0\leq t \leq200\mu s being:

I(t) = 7(1 - e^{-100000t})

I also am not sure how to proceed with finding the current for t > 200 microseconds.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I know that Iresistor must be:

Iresistor (I2) = Iinitial(I1) - Iinductor(I3).

However, whenever I use that I can't ever seem to get the actually statement they are getting for Iinductor. I get this DE:

L(dI3/dt) = -I2*R.

When I solve that I get:

I3 = I1 + e^(-Rt/L)

That expression doesn't seem right, and is not right.
 
Ithryndil said:
Since there is no Emf this becomes:
L(dI/dt) = - IR

This is the DE you need. The boundary condition is just continuity with the earlier function you found.
 
I am not sure I follow what you mean about the earlier function. Are you talking about Kirchhoffs rule with the Emf in it?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top