Particle in infinite potential well

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a particle in an infinite potential well, specifically focusing on the probability distributions at different times and the implications of the potential well disappearing. Participants explore the nature of the wavefunction and the energy of the particle over time.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants attempt to derive the probability distributions at two different times and question whether the energy of the particle changes over time. There is a discussion about the form of the wavefunction when the potential well disappears, with some suggesting the use of Fourier transforms to represent the wavefunction.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on the need for a Fourier transform rather than a simple expansion, indicating a productive direction in the discussion. There are differing opinions on the correctness of the proposed wavefunction forms, and some participants express uncertainty about the implications of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted concern regarding the completeness of the proposed solutions, particularly in relation to the marks allocated for the problem. Participants are also questioning the assumptions made about the energy behavior of the particle.

unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



29xxisp.png


Sketch the difference of probability distributions at the two times. Does the energy change with time?

The potential well suddenly disappears, what is the form of the wavefunction?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Part (a)

At t = 0, the probability distribution is:
|\phi|^2 = \frac{1}{a} \left[ sin^2(\frac{2\pi x}{a}) + 2 sin (\frac{2\pi x}{a})sin(\frac{4\pi x}{a}) + sin^2 (\frac{4\pi x}{a}) \right]

At ##t = \frac{\pi}{6\omega}##:
|\phi|^2 = \frac{1}{a} \left[ sin^2(\frac{2\pi x}{a}) + sin^2 (\frac{4\pi x}{a}) \right]

Thus the difference is simply ##\frac{2}{a} sin(\frac{2\pi x}{a}) sin (\frac{4\pi x}{a})##:

33acnkn.png


I think the energy of the particle changes with time, as simply using the TDSE ##-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{\partial^2 \phi}{\partial x^2} = E \phi## doesn't remove the ##exp(i\omega t)## terms.Part (b)

As the potential disappears, the particle becomes free. I think the general form is a linear combination of the n=2 and n=1 states.

For a free particle, ##u_{(x)} = A e^{i\frac{px}{\hbar}} = e^{ikx}##.

Thus, the form is:
\phi = Ae^{i(2kx - \omega t)} + Be^{i(4kx - \omega t)}

Not sure if I'm right.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Part b is not right. You have to expand the wave function using a Fourier transform. In your solution the particle jumps from a confined solution to a couple of plane waves that extend to infinity. That doesn't make sense. The Fourier transform will include all sorts of wavelengths - not just 2.
 
dauto said:
Part b is not right. You have to expand the wave function using a Fourier transform. In your solution the particle jumps from a confined solution to a couple of plane waves that extend to infinity. That doesn't make sense. The Fourier transform will include all sorts of wavelengths - not just 2.

So the solution would be:

\phi = \sum_p a_p e^{i(\frac{xp}{\hbar} - \omega t)}

Does this look right?
 
The solution seems a little short for 5 marks, in my opinion
 
Well you should use a Fourier transform as opposed to a Fourier expansion because the particles are free at the end of the problem. That means you should have an integral instead of a sum.
 
unscientific said:
I think the energy of the particle changes with time, as simply using the TDSE ##-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{\partial^2 \phi}{\partial x^2} = E \phi## doesn't remove the ##exp(i\omega t)## terms.

unscientific - I don't understand why you think the energy changes.

That equation looks like the TISE, not the TDSE.
 

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
785