Particle in one dimensional potentional well

derp267
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I hope this is in the right place, I'm new here. Anyway, my teacher hasn't shown us an example where U is anything but infinity, Uo, or 0 and I'm completely stumped on part B for this question since U is a function of x

Homework Statement


A particle of mass m moves in a one-dimensional potential well:
U(x)={infinity...x<0
{-hbar^2/mbx...x>=0

The normalized wave function is:
Ψ (x)={0...x<0
{Axe^(-x/b)...x>=0

Where b and A are constants.
a) Describe in words or equations how you would evaluate A( you do not need to actually evaluate for A).
b) Prove that the above Ψ (x) for x>=0 is an acceptable wave function
c) Find the total energy of the particle. Express your answer in the simplest terms

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


I did this on paper already and I don't know how to type an integral or anything so I just made a picture..apologies for the bad handwriting
http://imgur.com/OV8RN

So do I make -2mE/hbar^2 -k^2? Then I'm still left with -2/bx and I don't think I can use eulers method with that..I'm stuck
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming you didn't make any algebra errors, your math is correct so far. Since you're trying to prove that Ψ (x) is a solution for x>0, plug their wavefunction into your final equation and see if the left and right sides equal one another. Remember that you can adjust the constant E to try to make the two sides equal, but E is a constant, so it can't depend on x.
 
Thanks for your relpy. Okay so I did as you said and plugged in Axe^(-x/b) for Ψ and did some algebra. Then I did the second derivative of Ψ(x) and set them equal to each other.

What I end up with is the following:
http://i.imgur.com/mflUG.png

So does that mean that E=(-hbar^2)/(2mb^2)?
 
Assuming your algebra is right, yes. That's the energy which corresponds to the given wavefunction.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top