Particle Physics: Recommended Reading After Griffiths' Intro

AI Thread Summary
After completing Griffiths' Intro to Elementary Particles, readers interested in the experimental aspects of particle physics may consider "Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell" by Zee, as it offers a less rigorous approach to QFT. Another recommended text focuses on experimental techniques and results in high energy physics, although it has received mixed reviews on Amazon. Critics argue that the book does not serve well as an introduction to high energy physics, particularly for those expecting a theoretical framework. Many negative reviews stem from users who were required to purchase the book for theoretical courses, leading to disappointment. However, the book is deemed valuable for those specifically interested in learning experimental methods in high energy physics, suggesting it could be a suitable follow-up after Griffiths for this audience. Potential readers are encouraged to preview the book online to assess its fit for their needs.
eXorikos
Messages
281
Reaction score
5
I've recently finished a course using Griffiths' Intro to Elementary Particles. I'm interested in the subject, but what would you recommend for reading after that? I'm not planning to pursue particle physics or theoretical physics. I've considered Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell by Zee. I don't want any rigorous treatment of QFT. Other ideas are maybe a text on experimental techniques or results or expectations of experiments.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The reviews on Amazon are disturbingly bad. Are they exaggerating?
 
I think they are exaggerating, and it depends on what you are expecting. It seems like many reviewers were required to buy this text for a theoretical course and it turned out to be not so useful. The review by "Eugene" is spot-on:
Overall, this book does not fit its title well - it is not a good introduction to high energy physics ( unless you are so totally averse to math that you can't manage Griffiths or Peskin/Shroeder ). However, it has its own purpose - that is, to teach experimental methods in high energy physics. It probably should be studied after Griffiths by those who are interested in experimental side of particle physics.

But I have to admit I haven't thoroughly read the book myself, perhaps you should take a look with Google's preview.
 

Thread 'Books with a more theoretical approach to turbulence and DNS'

I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...
View full post »

Similar threads

Book recommendation after Sakurai Modern Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
151
Relativity Recommended general relativity textbook
Replies
19
Views
8K
Particle Is Griffiths Introduction to Elementary Particles up to date?
Replies
5
Views
3K
Intro Physics Finding Books on Elementary Particle Physics & Special Relativity
Replies
1
Views
1K
I Need Calculus Book Recommendations please
Replies
26
Views
5K
Textbook recommendations for second year physics (UK university)
Replies
5
Views
3K
Quantum Comparing Griffiths and Zettili for QM: Help Needed!
Replies
11
Views
8K
Calculus Should I read Spivak's Calculus as an undergrad in theoretical physics?
Replies
2
Views
4K
Particle Would like some particle physics textbook-reading advice
Replies
3
Views
2K
Applied Bibliography on integration and ODE/PDE solving techniques for physics
Replies
12
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top