Particle sliding across a surface with curved ends

AI Thread Summary
A particle slides along a track with elevated ends and a flat central section, where the flat part has a length of 40 cm and a coefficient of kinetic friction of 0.28. The particle is released from a height of 20 cm and the discussion focuses on applying the conservation of mechanical energy to analyze its motion. The initial kinetic energy is zero, and the gravitational potential energy will convert to kinetic energy as the particle descends. The work-energy theorem is used to account for energy lost due to friction on the flat section. The participant expresses gratitude for the guidance received, indicating a better understanding of the problem.
rmunoz
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A particle can slide along a track with elevated ends and a flat central part, as shown below. The flat part has length L = 40 cm. The curved portions of the track are frictionless, but for the flat part the coefficient of kinetic friction is µk = 0.28. The particle is released from rest at point A, which is a height h = L/2. How far from the left edge of the flat does the particle finally stop? http://www.webassign.net/halliday8e/pc/halliday8019c08/halliday8019c08-fig-0057.htm


Homework Equations


Ugrav=mgh
K= 1/2mv^2
a(centripital)= v^2/r
Fric(kinetic)= \mumgsin90=> \mumg

Sorry to say, but the reason I'm having trouble with this problem is frankly that I have no idea how to start! The goal for me is to be able to use the law of conservation of mechanical energy to describe the particle's motion. At first glance, I feel like the equation for the kinetic energy of the particle, right after the first fall should take into account the velocity calculated by centripital acceleration. I can tell initially that the kinetic energy will be 0 since its not moving and that the Ugrav will describe the total mechanical energy within the system. Is this correct, or even relevant at all? Also, i have no idea how to describe the loss of kinetic energy as an increase in the amount of "heat" energy within the system due to the friction-surface. Any tips on how to get the ball rolling on this problem?

Sorry if this is at all unclear, this is my first post and as you can probably tell, I'm in dire need of some physics help, but more than willing to put in the effort with guidance!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

rmunoz said:
A particle can slide along a track with elevated ends and a flat central part, as shown below. The flat part has length L = 40 cm. The curved portions of the track are frictionless, but for the flat part the coefficient of kinetic friction is µk = 0.28. The particle is released from rest at point A, which is a height h = L/2. How far from the left edge of the flat does the particle finally stop?

The goal for me is to be able to use the law of conservation of mechanical energy to describe the particle's motion.

Hi rmunoz ! Welcome to PF! :wink:

As you say, this is an energy problem …

use conservation of energy on the curved part (the centripetal acceleration is irrelevant), and the work-energy theorem ( work done by friction = energy lost) on the flat part :smile:
 
Wow, got it right on the first try! that was a lot easier than i thought it was going to be, thank you very much tiny-tim for the help... i think i like this website!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top