Particles in an ideal monatomic gas

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jason Gomez
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gas Particles
Jason Gomez
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Prove that for particles in an ideal monatomic gas the average energy Eav can be given by:

Eav=\int_{0}^{\infty }Ep(E)dE=3/2kT

where the probablity distribution p(E) is given by:
p(E)dE=2/\sqrt{\pi}(kT)^{3/2}\times e^{-E/} dE


Homework Equations



Let E/kT

The Attempt at a Solution


after working this problem over and over, this is as far as I can get

2\pi^{-1/2}\int_{0}^{\infty}u^{3/2}e^{-u}de=2\pi^{-1/2}\left ( 2/5u^{5/2}e^{-u}-ue^{-u}u^{3/2} \right )

i have tried pulling variables out but get no where, I feel it is right up to this point but do not know where to go from here except factor out common variables, but once again I get know where
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Or making substitution
<br /> u=p^2<br />
<br /> du=2pdp<br />
we get
<br /> \int p^3 e^{-p^2} 2pdp<br />
and integrating by parts.
 
Thank you I think I see a similarity between that and the problem I am working but I am on my phone looking at it, I will let you know how it goes when I get home
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top