Particles on Deforming Surfaces: Theory & Analysis

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the implications of a particle moving on a deforming surface, questioning the validity of classical mechanics principles like virtual work and Hamilton's principle. It suggests that while the normal force does work due to surface deformation, the mathematical framework can still hold if the surface's time dependence is predetermined and unaffected by the particle's motion. The D'Alembert-Lagrange principle remains applicable, allowing for the use of Lagrangian formalism in analyzing the system. The conversation references D.T. Greenwood's "Classical Dynamics" for further insights on the topic. Overall, the analysis indicates that ideal constraints can still be valid despite surface deformation.
andresB
Messages
625
Reaction score
374
All books in analytical mechanics explain the case of a particle moving on a given static surface. But what happen if, for example, the surface is having some deformation?. I imagine that the principle of virtual work, and hence, D'Alembert are no longer valid since the normal force by the surface do work. Hence Hamilton principle no longer work either.

is there a theory for a particle moving on such deforming surface?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you specify the force is that is deforming the constraint? That is the source of the work.
 
FactChecker said:
Can you specify the force is that is deforming the constraint? That is the source of the work.

Well, It doesn't matter I think.

Mathematically, think in point moving along the surface S(x,y,z,t)=0, where the surface dependence on time is given beforehand and it is not affected by the motion of the particle.
 
Last edited:
By definition ideal constraints do not work on virtual displacements in your case ##\delta x,\delta y,\delta z,##
$$\frac{\partial S}{\partial x}\delta x+\frac{\partial S}{\partial y}\delta y+\frac{\partial S}{\partial z}\delta z=0$$
No problem, the D'Alembert-Lagrange principle keeps holding as well as all the Lagrangian formalism
For details see D T Greenwood Classical Dynamics
 
  • Like
Likes andresB
wrobel said:
For details see D T Greenwood Classical Dynamics
That was a really good read, thank you.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top