Particle's spin when subject to a constant magnetic field

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the quantum mechanics problem involving an alkali atom's spin in a constant magnetic field, specifically through a Stern-Gerlach apparatus. The Hamiltonian is defined as \(\widehat{H} = -\vec{u_{B}} \cdot \widehat{S}\), where \(\vec{u_{B}} = \frac{q}{2m_{e}}\). The user, Daniel, initially miscalculated a factor of 2 in the Hamiltonian's expression and received guidance on correcting this error. The final goal is to determine the probability of the atom passing through the second Stern-Gerlach apparatus, which requires normalization of the state vector.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly spin and magnetic fields.
  • Familiarity with the Stern-Gerlach experiment and its implications for quantum state measurement.
  • Knowledge of Hamiltonians and Schrödinger's equation in quantum systems.
  • Proficiency in using Pauli matrices for spin calculations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of the Hamiltonian for spin-1/2 particles in magnetic fields.
  • Learn about the normalization conditions for quantum state vectors.
  • Study the role of the g-factor in quantum mechanics and its impact on Hamiltonian calculations.
  • Explore the time evolution of quantum states using Schrödinger's equation in more complex scenarios.
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students studying quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the behavior of spin in magnetic fields will benefit from this discussion.

Jalo
Messages
117
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An alkali atom, on it's fundamental state, passes through a Stern-Gerlach apparatum, which will only transmit atoms with their spins aligned along the +z direction. After that the atoms travel, during a finite time τ, through a region of constant magnetic field \vec{B}=B\vec{e_{x}}.

After that time τ the atoms pass through a new Stern-Gerlach apparatum, which only allows atoms with spin along -z to pass. What's the probability that they will pass?

Homework Equations



Pauli matrices
\widehat{H}=-\vec{u_{B}}.\widehat{S}
u_{B}=\frac{q}{2m_{e}}


The Attempt at a Solution



From the problem it's easy to see that the state of the system at the instant t=0 is:

|\psi>(t=0)=|+>_{z}

Then I assumed that, while being under the influence of the constant magnetic field along the x direction, the state is:

|\psi>=\alpha (t)|+>_{z} + \beta (t) |->_{z}

Next I applied the hamiltonian to my state |\psi>. Since \vec{B} = B\vec{e_{x}}:

\widehat{H}|\psi>=-\frac{qB}{2m}\widehat{S_{x}}|\psi>
\widehat{H}|\psi>=-\frac{qB}{2m}\widehat{S_{x}}(\alpha (t)|+>_{z}+\beta (t) |->_{z})

Since \widehat{S_{x}}=\hbar \sigma _{x}, applying it to |\psi> returns:
\widehat{H}|\psi>=-\frac{qB\hbar}{4m}(\beta (t)|+>_{z}+\alpha (t) |->_{z})

Defining \omega=\frac{qB}{4m}:

\widehat{H}|\psi>=-w\hbar(\beta (t)|+>_{z}+\alpha (t) |->_{z})

Now, using Schrödinger's equation we get:

\widehat{H}|\psi>=i\hbar \frac{d}{dt}|\psi>
\frac{d}{dt}(\alpha (t)|+>_{z} + \beta (t) |->_{z}) = iw(\beta (t)|+>_{z}+\alpha (t) |->_{z})

Separating this we get:

\frac{d}{dt}\alpha (t) = iw\beta (t)
\frac{d}{dt}\beta (t) = iw\alpha (t)

Applying another derivative to the first differential equation we get:
\frac{d^{2}}{dt^{2}}\alpha (t) = iw\frac{d}{dt}\beta (t)
\frac{d^{2}}{dt^{2}}\alpha (t) = -w^{2}\alpha

Doing the same to the second achieves a similar result:

\frac{d^{2}}{dt^{2}}\beta (t) = -w^{2}\beta

Solving both I got:

\alpha (t) = Ae^{iwt} + Be^{-iwt}
\alpha (t) = Ce^{iwt} + De^{-iwt}

Now, since I know that |\psi>(t=0) = |+>_{z}, I know that:
A+B=1
C = -D

From this I can conclude that:
\beta (t) = Fsin(wt)

This is as far as I can get.. I don't know what to do from here. Am I approaching the problem wrongly? Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks.
Daniel
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, Daniel.

First, there appears to be a problem with a factor of 2 in your expression
\widehat{H}|\psi>=-\frac{qB\hbar}{4m}(\beta (t)|+>_{z}+\alpha (t) |->_{z}).

I don't believe the 4 in the denominator is correct. Did you include the "g-factor" of the electron? Anyway, you might see if you can track down the error. (Hope I'm not the one in error, I always get a headache with the factors of 2 in this type of problem!)

Later, you have

\alpha (t) = Ae^{iwt} + Be^{-iwt}
\alpha (t) = Ce^{iwt} + De^{-iwt}


In the second equation I think you meant to type \beta (t) instead of \alpha (t).

This looks good (but your ##\omega## will need to be corrected for the factor of 2 problem mentioned above).

But note, C and D are not independent of A and B. Remember you have

\frac{d}{dt}\alpha (t) = iw\beta (t)

So, you can determine \beta (t) from \alpha (t).

You should be able to find A and B from the initial conditions and from the fact that you want your state to be normalized.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
I forgot that I was only interested in the |->_{z} component.
Regarding the factor of 2, I'll correct it. However my major issue has been resolved, so thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K