Particles traveling in curved lines?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jarfi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lines Particles
Jarfi
Messages
384
Reaction score
12
My chem/physics teacher said that electrons don't travel in a straight direction, he said something about them traveling in random or spiral directions. So I was wondering ofcourse all the photos from the LHC show spirals, so that must be the traces of particles created by the collision. Do all particles travel like this? or just electrons, do they travel in a random direction? and is there an answer to why they travel like this? but not straight.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Electrons spiral because of magnetic fields, they manipulate E&M fields in particle accelerators to accelerate them and keep them 'trapped' so to speak.

Don't know much about the other particles though.
 
Jarfi said:
My chem/physics teacher said that electrons don't travel in a straight direction, he said something about them traveling in random or spiral directions. So I was wondering ofcourse all the photos from the LHC show spirals, so that must be the traces of particles created by the collision. Do all particles travel like this? or just electrons, do they travel in a random direction? and is there an answer to why they travel like this? but not straight.

Any charge (elecgtron, proton, ion) moving through a magnetic field will experience a force that is at right angles to its motion and in a direction that depends on the magnetic field vector. This will produce a spiral motion (or circular if the charge is moving at right angles to the field). I would not have called it "random" motion because it is determined by the conditions but, as they may not be known accurately then the motion may be hard to predict. They spiral left or right, depending on the sign of the charge and the radius of the spiral depends on their mass and strength of field.

Ultra fast particles from outer space tend to spiral around the Earth's magnetic field lines. This helps to protect us from their effects because they follow much longer paths than if they were coming in 'direct' as they collide with many more air molecules and lose most of their energy before they get to the ground. (Useful)

Neutral particles are not affected by electromagnetic fields and tend to just plough on until they actually hit something. Neutrons go straight through atoms, even, unless they find the nucleus - which is why they are so dangerous; you need a lot of screening to be safe from them.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top