Pascal's Law - Weight of Water Involvement

AI Thread Summary
Pascal's Law indicates that pressure in a confined incompressible fluid is transmitted equally in all directions, but the scenarios presented differ in height, affecting pressure. In Scenario 1, the right cylinder's height results in greater pressure at the bottom compared to Scenario 2, where both cylinders are at the same height. The weight of the water does influence the system, as pressure decreases with height, leading to a pressure difference of ΔP=ρgh. In practical applications, such as hydraulic lifts, this gravitational head may be negligible compared to the working pressures involved. Ultimately, the significance of the gravitational head depends on the specific problem being analyzed.
joejoekelly1
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Pascal’s Law states “pressure exerted anywhere in a confined incompressible fluid is transmitted equally in all directions throughout the fluid such that the pressure ratio (initial difference) remains the same”. My question is, are the two scenarios that I have outlined the same? (see attached).

Scenario 1 is where the right hand cylinder is much higher than the left hand cylinder.

Scenario 2 is where both cylinders are at the same height.

However does the weight of the water affect the system in scenario 1? Because the right hand cylinder is high up in scenario 1, the pressure of the water at the bottom of scenario 1 is greater than scenario 2. Therefore will scenario 1 work as good as scenario 2?
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
joejoekelly1 said:
Pascal’s Law states “pressure exerted anywhere in a confined incompressible fluid is transmitted equally in all directions throughout the fluid such that the pressure ratio (initial difference) remains the same”. My question is, are the two scenarios that I have outlined the same? (see attached).

Scenario 1 is where the right hand cylinder is much higher than the left hand cylinder.

Scenario 2 is where both cylinders are at the same height.

However does the weight of the water affect the system in scenario 1? Because the right hand cylinder is high up in scenario 1, the pressure of the water at the bottom of scenario 1 is greater than scenario 2. Therefore will scenario 1 work as good as scenario 2?

Statically, the pressure in a liquid decreases with height. So in Scenario 1 the pressure in the right-hand cylinder will be less than the pressure in the left-hand cylinder, by an amount ΔP=ρgh. The quantity ρg is the weight density of the liquid (about 62.4 lbf/ft3 for water). For water this means that the pressure decreases about 1 atmosphere (14.696 psi) for every 33.9 ft in altitude (or conversely the pressure increases 1 atm for every 33.9 feet in depth). Another way of expressing this is 1/\rho g = 0.016026 ft/psf = 2.3077 ft/psi.

Now, having said that, whether the gravitational "head" is significant depends on the problem you're working. If you're dealing with a hydraulic lift, for example, with working pressures of roughly 2000 psi, say, then a few psi pressure difference due to the gravitational head may be insignificant. In terms of pressure head (measured in feet or meters), the gravitational head is just the elevation difference between two points, while the static pressure head is ΔP/ρg, so 2000 psi is 2000*2.3077 = 4615 feet. In fact, in a lot of introductory hydrostatics problems it may be assumed that the gravitational head is insignificant.

But your mileage may vary -- consult your textbook.

BBB
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top