Pascals's Principle and Airsoft?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chemical Bros
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Principle
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the force exerted on a BB as it exits an airsoft gun's barrel, utilizing Hooke's Law and Pascal's Principle. The user seeks to understand if Pascal's Principle, typically applied to static and confined systems, can be adapted for this dynamic scenario. They derive an equation relating the forces and areas involved in the piston mechanism but question its applicability. Additionally, they mention the potential use of Bernoulli's equation for compressible flow as an alternative method. The conversation emphasizes the need for accurate calculations in airsoft mechanics, particularly regarding the behavior of air as a compressible fluid.
Chemical Bros
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Alright I was just thinking about the internals of an airsoft gun and I began to wonder how to calculate the force exerted on the BB as it leaves the barrel. Here is an image of the internals:

Link to image:

http://www.google.ca/imgres?imgurl=...age=1&ndsp=21&ved=1t:429,r:14,s:0&tx=60&ty=36

I then decided to use hooke's law for the force of the spring as that would be the force exerted on the piston. My next step, as I was never really taught fluid dynamics, was if I was to use Pascal's principle to calculate the force at the nozzle (black piece right before the BB).

F(1)=-kx

therefore (using pascal principle)

F(1)=F(2) * (A1/A2)

-kx=F(2)*(A1/A2)

F(2)=(-kx)/(A2/A1)

I looked up the principle and most of the time it says it works if its static and confined. My question is if the equation can be used in this circumstance or if there is another way to find the force exerted on the BB? I also came across this website:

http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/pneumatic-cylinder-force-d_1273.html

Are these equations viable or would they not suit this type of piston/cylinder? Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top