Is Passive Reading Effective in Physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zahero_2007
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Reading
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on different reading strategies for studying complex subjects like physics and math. One participant advocates for a two-step approach: first, passive reading to grasp the overall concepts, followed by active reading for deeper understanding. Others express that passive reading can lead to confusion and ineffective learning, emphasizing the need for a structured approach that includes deriving formulas and solving problems. The importance of maintaining engagement during reading is highlighted, with some suggesting that taking breaks can enhance retention. Overall, the effectiveness of a reading method depends on individual learning styles and preferences.
zahero_2007
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
What do you think about this reading style ? Iam used to passively read a textbook in physics or math to get a picture about what this is all about then I Actively read the text carefully with a pen and papers . Passive reading makes me cover a lot of material in a relatively short time for example in differential geometry . What do you think of this method?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If it works for you, it's ok :cool:

I used to do that studying other disciplines other than math/physics. I can't do it in maths or physics because I can't understand anything if I read things fast, and I usually think it's harder than it really is. I always see very rapidly what's on the book just for curiousity, but it doesn't help me...
 
I first go through the deriving of all the formulas and then go back to read passively to understand in English.
 
http://www.overcomingbias.com/2010/05/chase-your-reading.html
It seems to me that while reading non-fiction, most folks are in searching mode. Most would be more intellectually productive, however, in chasing mode. It helps to have in mind a question, puzzle, or problem, and then read in order to answer your question, explain your puzzle, or solve your problem.

One particularly helpful comment for me is that

Searching allows you to create the boxes that chasing can fill in the first place.

I, too, really need to get a big picture before delving in any specific topic, otherwise I'll forget the details easily. However, I'm going to fall asleep if I read books passively. So I have to keep in mind when reading passively that my goal is to find an interesting problem, a piece of the big picture, and get started deriving and calculating things.
 
Truecrimson said:
However, I'm going to fall asleep if I read books passively.
Why is that bad? When I study I usually read for 30 minutes, then sleep/rest for 5-30 minutes depending on how exhausting the read was, repeat. Resting/sleeping while studying helps your mind process and retain the information.
 
I actually exaggerated that part. But there was one time when I took a particle physics class using Martin and Shaw. It's that bad.
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
102
Views
5K
Replies
32
Views
454
Replies
71
Views
848
Replies
60
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
7K
Replies
19
Views
5K
Back
Top