Path integral in coherent states

topper
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hey,

there is something I don't really understand about the path integral (functional integral) formalism in QFT:

Why do you need to introduce a coherent-state representation of the Dirac fields in order to evaluate their path integral?
Where is the crucial point why it doesn't work like in the scalar field case, where you have the operators in the correlation function on the one side and just scalar functions under the integral on the other side?

I hope someone gets my point :)

Thanks,
topper
 
Physics news on Phys.org
_42The main difference between a scalar field and a Dirac field is that the former is composed of complex numbers, while the latter is composed of spinor wavefunctions. This means that the path integral for a Dirac field needs to be evaluated in terms of wavefunctions, rather than just scalar functions. To do this, we introduce a coherent-state representation of the Dirac fields, which allows us to express the path integral as an integration over wavefunction amplitudes. This is in contrast to the scalar field, where we can evaluate the path integral directly in terms of scalar functions without introducing a coherent-state representation.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top