B Pauli Exclusion Principle: Quantum Coherence & Range

john t
Messages
33
Reaction score
3
Over what range is the Pauli Exclusion Principle important? As a chemist I take it as an atom, but that seems an arbitrary stipulation. For instance, in metals how far apart must 2 electrons be to have the same 4 quantum numbers? I have seen that it has to do more with quantum coherence field than a certain space range. What determines the extent of the quantum coherence?

John Thompson
 
  • Like
Likes Mileto Graziano
Physics news on Phys.org
john t said:
Over what range is the Pauli Exclusion Principle important?

Forever. You always have to antisymmetrize the wavefunction. Whether or not that makes a noticeable difference to anything you observe depends on how much you can notice.
 
Pauli exclusion is important in any matter that has radiated down to its ground state (such that there aren't many more transitions left to happen, if any.) These systems include:
  • Blocks of metal, whose electrons occupy something fairly close to one giant pile of degeneracy.
  • Atoms, like you mentioned.
  • White dwarfs.
In all of these cases, the system has lost enough energy that it is not predominately the motion of the material that keeps it from collapsing. (A gas, I think, would be mainly held up by motion and not by quantum effects; PV=nRT comes from the mechanics of the atoms bouncing around.)

All fermions will end up in situations where exclusion is important if you cool them down enough. If you heat them up enough, they fly up into the high states and populate them so sparsely that exclusion stops being important. Examples of those things would be turning metal into plasma, ionizing electrons away from atoms, and going from white dwarfs to living stars which are kept very hot by fusion.
 
  • Like
Likes Imager and Mileto Graziano
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top