What is the Pauli exclusion principle?

supernovae
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
hi

i just wanted to ask if anyone could help me understand this principle i have read around and still seem to be getting nowhere.
i found this example but its confusing and does not give explanations http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/pauli.html#c1

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi supernovae! :smile:

erm … if the books can't help, why would we be any better? :confused:

Perhaps if you quote some specific sentence you don't understand, we could have a go at explaining that? :smile:
 
The link you gave is a bit advanced for somebody being exposed to the Pauli principle for the very first time. In a nutshell: No two particles can have the same exact quantum state at the same exact time.

What's a quantum state you might say? If you're drawing Lewis dot diagrams, think of it like no two electrons can be in the exact place at the same exact time.
 
cmos said:
The link you gave is a bit advanced for somebody being exposed to the Pauli principle for the very first time. In a nutshell: No two particles can have the same exact quantum state at the same exact time.

What's a quantum state you might say? If you're drawing Lewis dot diagrams, think of it like no two electrons can be in the exact place at the same exact time.

There should be a qualification here that this rule only applies to Fermions, i.e. particles with spin 1/2, 3/2, etc. Particles with spin 0, 1, etc are Bosons, and do not obey Pauli's exclusion principle.

As an example, protons and neutrons are Fermions, photos are Bosons.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top