Pauli Matrices and orthogonal projections

clumsy9irl
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Ok, I'm working with the Pauli Matrices, and I've already gone through showing a few bits of information. I've got a good idea how to keep going, but I'm not exactly sure about this one--

say M= 1/2(alphaI + a*sigma)

where alpha E C, a=(ax, ay, az) a complex vector, a*sigma=ax sigmax+ay sigmay+ az sigmz, and I is the identity matrix.


So, an orthogonal projection means that for a matrix P, P^2 and P dagger are both equal to P, right?

Supposedly alpha and a can beonstrained so that M is an orthogonal projection.


How would I go about doing that? :confused:


Thanks muchly!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Some hints

Hey there !

Here are some hints on a was to do it :

You will only use the fact that M^2 = M...

1) Compute M^2 :

M^2 = \cfrac{1}{4}\left(\alpha I + \sum_i a_i \sigma_i \right)^2 = ...

You will find a term like \sum_i \sum_j a_i a_j \sigma_i \sigma

In order to reduce this term, use some common identities :

\sigma_i \sigma_j = I \delta_{ij} + i \epsilon_{ijk} \sigma_k

and

\sigma_i \sigma_j + \sigma_j \sigma_i = 2 \delta_{ij} I

If you applied them correctly, you should get something quite simple. You then use the fact that M^2 = M and you will find by identification :
\alpha = 1 \text{ and } ||a|| = 1, which is your final answer (Hopefully, I didn't mess up).

If you're not confident with the use of the Levi-Civita symbol, another (more tedious) way is to write all in matrix notation (2x2), compute M^2 and put this equal to M... You will get 4 equations, which will reduce to the answer given above.

Hope this helps,
Cheers,
Florian
 
i must've screwed something up, for I'm getting a sqrt(2) for my alpha?

maybe i screwed up something with the identities...
 
oh, and i almost forgot, THANK YOU VERY MUCH!
 
can we solve the particle in a box problem using schrodingers equation?
 
mayriluseeya said:
can we solve the particle in a box problem using schrodingers equation?

Sure, it's easy; they do it in Halliday and Resnick.

(But not with the Pauli spin matrices.)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top