A Pauli spin matrices

Eliena
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
I tried to solve this expression (Οƒi β‹…Οƒj)Οƒk in terms of zth component of pauli spin matrices. So that i can apply the spin projection operator to the baryonic wavefunctions. As the Οƒy component contains the imaginary terms, so i think it is more convenient to write spin in terms of Οƒz only. Please give suggestions.
Using the identity for the dot product of Pauli matrices: πœŽπ‘–β‹…πœŽπ‘—=πœŽπ‘–π‘₯πœŽπ‘—π‘₯ + πœŽπ‘–π‘¦πœŽπ‘—π‘¦ + πœŽπ‘–π‘§πœŽπ‘—π‘§. How to express this purely in terms of πœŽπ‘§, as x and 𝑦 components change spin states
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can write it using ladder operators ##\sigma_{\pm}=\sigma_x\pm i\sigma_y##.
 
pines-demon said:
You can write it using ladder operators ##\sigma_{\pm}=\sigma_x\pm i\sigma_y##.
How it could be applied to the proton spin wavefunction?
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, SchrΓΆdinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, SchrΓΆdinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, SchrΓΆdinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By β€œemergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top