Pauli's exclusion principle and fine structures

AI Thread Summary
Pauli's exclusion principle is crucial for understanding fine structure in atomic emission spectra, as it restricts fermions like electrons to occupy unique quantum states. While the Bohr model describes energy levels based on orbital angular momentum, it does not account for the electron's spin and magnetic moment, which lead to energy level splitting. This splitting results in fine structures that are observable in spectral lines. Although some argue that the principle is more relevant to atomic structure than fine structures, it ultimately supports the existence of distinct energy levels necessary for chemical behavior. The principle ensures that electrons cannot all occupy the lowest energy state, allowing for the complexity of atomic interactions.
jubba
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Can anybody help me understand how pauli's exclusion principle helps explain the existence of fine line structures in the emmission spectra for atoms, which could not be explained by Bohr's model.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Basically the Pauli exclusion principle allows only 1
Fermion for each available energy level (spin 1/2 particle such as electrons - spin 1 particles such as protons are called Bosons and do not have this restriction).
The Bohr theory also called the Bohr-Sommerfeld theory only goes as far
as describing the allowed values of the orbital angular momentum of the electron.
However, the electron has additional properties, namely its spin angular
momentum and its magnetic moment. So within the allowed values for
"Bohr" angular momentum a splitting of the available energy states
occurs when these additional properties of the electron are considered,
but there will still be no more than 1 electron occupying each energy
state under the Pauli exclusion principle.
Hope this simplified explanation helps!
 
fine structures

I understand this but how does Pauli's exclusion principle help explain fine structures. Because i was asked this but i don't think that pauli's exclusion principle is required to explain fine structures.
 
Well you have energy levels that split into what is knwn as the fine structure and you have the pauli exclusion principle that states that no two fermions may exist in the same quantum state. Why do you think electrons split into different energy levels?
 
but take hyrdogen where there is only one electron. why does the fine structures occur then as there is no need for the energy levels to split, to obey pauli's exclusion principle.
 
Last edited:
I think that the Pauli Principle is generally credited with explaining the
structure of the atoms in the periodic table (and thus the associated
energy levels) more than it is in explaining the fine spectral lines.
However, the fine spectral lines confirm the atomic structure as
postulated in the exclusion principle.
Consider the structure of atoms not constrained by the exclusion principle - all of the electrons in a ground state atom would be clustered
around the nucleus in a single (the lowest) energy state. That would
seem to complicate things considerably - there wouldn't even be
valence electrons to explain chemical reactions
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top