[PChem] Maxwell-Boltzmann Molecule Mean Speed

Coop
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am having trouble with this concept...

"A mean speed (c) is calculated by multiplying each speed by the fraction of molecules that have that speed, and then adding all the products together. When the speed varies over a continuous range, the sum is replaced by an integral. To employ this approach here, we note that the fraction of molecules with a speed in the range v to v + dv is f(v)dv, so the product of this fraction and the speed is vf(v)dv. The mean speed is obtained by evaluating the integral

c=\int vf(v)dv."

This passage is dealing with the M-B Speed Distribution. So integrating the function would give you the probability of finding a molecule with the speed between the lower and upper bounds, correct? So if you just took the integral of the function with no bounds it should be equal to one. I am having trouble seeing why integrating the product of the function and the speed leads to an average...

...Could anyone try and clear this up for me?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The integral over the function "f(v)" would equal one. What you integrate here is the function "v*f(v)".
 
Timo said:
The integral over the function "f(v)" would equal one. What you integrate here is the function "v*f(v)".

Yes sorry, I see that my wording was ambiguous. I am having trouble seeing why integrating v*f(v) gives you an average.
 
Coop said:
Yes sorry, I see that my wording was ambiguous. I am having trouble seeing why integrating v*f(v) gives you an average.
If f(x) is a probability distribution then the integral over x*f(x) pretty much is the definition of the average, mean, or expectancy value of the property x. Not sure what I can do to help you understanding it. Maybe an example that does not explicity use an integral: Rolling a dice has an equal probability 1/6 for each side of the dice. The expectancy value is <x> = 1*1/6 + 2*1/6 +3*1/6 + 4*1/6 +5*1/6 + 6*1/6 = \sum_{i=1}^6 i * p(i), with p(i) being the probability for event/value i.

I am not sure that emphasizing "weighted average" really helps understanding (but this thread has a chance to prove me wrong). Technically, the integral over x*f(x) is a weighted average of x with f(x) being the weights. But in my experience the term "weighted average" is only used when a sensible "unweighted average" would exist, which is not the case here (there is no point in or sensible meaning of "the average real number").
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks for following up :). Yes, I was confused at where the integral c=∫vf(v)dv was coming from (I don't like using random equations which I don't know where they came from) but I figured out it was pretty much just a definition.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top