PDE kind

  • Thread starter tehno
  • Start date
360
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

[tex]\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}\cdot \frac{\partial z}{\partial y}=xyz^2[/tex]

People,do we know how to solve this?
I'm looking for the explicite solution z=f(x,y) so far I'm unable to solve this .Thinking of it for a half a day without much of the progress.Even though I haven't tryed all dirty tricks yet.
:uhh:
 

Answers and Replies

360
0
Expert help would be appreciated.
 
arildno
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
9,946
130
Well, you might see how separation of variables can help you:
[tex]z=g(x)h(y)\to{g}'gh'h=xy(gh)^{2}\to\frac{g'}{gx}=\frac{yh}{h'}[/tex]

Since LHS is a function of x, whereas RHS is a function of y, we get:
[tex]g'(x)=Kxg(x), h'(y)=\frac{1}{K}yh(y)\to{g}(x)=Ae^{\frac{Kx^{2}}{2}},h(y)=Be^{\frac{y^{2}}{2K}}[/tex]
with A, B, K constants.

Note that it by no means follows from this that all solutions of your PDE must be on this form!

For example, let f(x,y)=G(xy). Then:
[tex]\frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{x}}=yG',\frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{y}}=xG'\to{(G')^{2}}=G^{2}\to{G'}=\pm{G}, z_{+}(x,y)=Ae^{xy},z_{-}(x,y)=Be^{-xy}[/tex]

These radically different special solutions should tell you that to arrive at some simple, generally valid formula for the solutions is impossible. That's usually the case with non-linear PDE's in particular.
 
Last edited:
360
0
Thanks arildno for the inputs.
Neverthless,I have good news:I managed today to find "all" PDE solutions as representation in formal explicite expression z=f(x,y).
Indeed ,as you indicate,that's really broad spectrum of the functions .
:smile:
 
arildno
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
9,946
130
I dis-assume it is a "simple" formula..
 
360
0
I dis-assume it is a "simple" formula..
These radically different special solutions should tell you that to arrive at some simple, generally valid formula for the solutions is impossible. That's usually the case with non-linear PDE's in particular.
But I arrived at the generally valid (and explicite!) formula that describes all the solutions of this PDE.
For the first time I effectively find this forum helpful for me,becouse your suggestion of thinking in "exponential terms" was the idea (there's no a classical linear superpositon ,however).
The method of the separation of variables is natural there,but I was blind or something haven't had noticed it before.

The most important was the first step :to write PDE as

[tex]z^{-1}\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}\cdot z^{-1}\frac{\partial z}{\partial y}=xy[/tex]
Other work I will leave as an exercise.
Here's my general formula:

[tex]z=e^{\frac{C^2x^2+y^2}{2C}+ \phi (C)}[/tex]


where [itex]\phi[/itex] is some derivabile arbitrary function such that:

[itex]\phi '(C) +\frac{x^2}{2}-\frac{y^2}{2C^2}=0[/itex]
 
Last edited:
arildno
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
9,946
130
Oh, really?
As far as I know,
[tex]\frac{1}{z}\frac{\partial{z}}{\partial{x}}=\frac{\partial}{\partial{x}}(\log(|z(x,y)|)+f(y))[/tex]
where f is an arbitrary function of y
Did you take that into account as well?


EDIT:

Personally, I'd have thought some progress might be made to make a switch to polar, or hyperbolic coordinates, but I haven't done so myself..
 
Last edited:
360
0
I collected all the solutions by my formula, neglecting variable interchangable ones,becouse I solved PDE.Try to solve PDE.You will see.
 
arildno
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
9,946
130
Hmm...since I'm not very clever, I won't be able to do so.
Perhaps you can post your solution in a while? :smile:
 
360
0
All righty.I think ,at least,I owe you that so here is the method.

Write PDE as:
[tex]\frac{\partial z}{z\partial x}\cdot \frac{\partial z}{z\partial y}=xy[/tex]

Let's search for the solutions of this PDE in implicite form.
In order to do that note:

[tex](ln\ z)'=\frac{1}{z}[/tex].

Having on mind this and by introducing substitutions:

[tex]\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}=p,\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}=q [/tex]

our PDE turns into:

[tex]p\cdot q=xy[/tex]

Voila!
The separation of the variables occurs.We have:

[tex]\frac{p}{x}=\frac{y}{q}=C \rightarrow du=Cxdx+\frac{ydy}{C}\rightarrow u=\frac{Cx^2}{2}+\frac{y^2}{2C}+C_{1}[/tex]


Therefore the complete integral of PDE is:

[tex]ln\ z=\frac{Cx^2}{2}+\frac{y^2}{2C} +C_{1}[/tex]


General solution of first order PDE in variables ,knowing one solution H
is obtained per definiton from the system:


[tex]H(x,y,z,a,b)=0[/tex]
[tex]\frac{\partial H}{\partial a} + \frac{\partial H}{\partial b}\cdot f'(a)=0[/tex]

So,under assuption that between parameters a and b exists functional relation f(a)=b ,where f is an arbitrary derivabile function the general solution ,after solving the system can be written as:

[tex]ln\ z=\frac{Cx^2}{2}+\frac{y^2}{2C}+2C + f(C)[/tex]

[tex]f'(C) +\frac{x^2}{2}-\frac{y^2}{2C^2}=0[/tex]

Where f is arbitrary function and C real constant.


This solution isn't equivalent in notation with the one given previously.
However, I stressed that I was looking for only solutions given in explicite form z=f(x,y).Hence..
 
Last edited:

Related Threads for: PDE kind

Replies
0
Views
931
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
769
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
4K
Top