PDE Math Homework Help: Solving BVPs for Periodic Functions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a boundary value problem (BVP) for a partial differential equation (PDE) involving continuous and piecewise smooth periodic functions. The specific PDE is given by ut(x,t) = uxx(x,t) for (x,t) in R x (0,∞), with the initial condition u(x,0) = f(x).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of separation of variables to approach the PDE, with attempts to derive solutions based on different cases for a parameter A. Questions arise regarding the appropriate choice of A and the implications of boundary conditions, particularly the periodicity of the functions involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various attempts to solve the PDE, with some participants suggesting the use of Fourier series. There is a recognition of the complexity introduced by the absence of explicit boundary conditions, leading to differing interpretations of the problem setup. One participant claims to have found an answer, but the overall consensus on the approach remains unclear.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the lack of specified boundary conditions for the extremities of x, which complicates the problem. The original poster emphasizes that the problem explicitly instructs the use of Fourier series, suggesting a focus on periodic solutions.

r.a.c.
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



We are given f \epsilon C(T) [set of continuous and 2pi periodic functions] and PS(T) [set of piecewise smooth and 2pi periodic functions]

SOlve the BVP

ut(x,t) = uxx(x,t) ; (x,t) belongs to R x (0,inf)
u(x,0) = f(x) ; x belongs to R


Find a solution of this PDE



Homework Equations



The only relevant equation I can think of is a Fourier Inversion which states that if is continuous and piecewise smooth then
f(x) = \sum f^h(n) e^i^n^x ; where f^h = 1/2\pi \int f(x)e^-^i^n^x dx


The Attempt at a Solution



I have tried solving the first equation ODE till I get by separation of varaibles
S''(x) - AS(x) = 0 and T'(t) - AT(t) = 0

A is real. Three cases: A>0 in which case the solution is S(x) = C(sin(Lx)) + B(cos(Lx))
where C,B are constants and L = (-L)^(1/2)
Then I tried using power series expansion of sin and cos to be able to relate it to the Fourier series of f (seeing as f(x) = S(x)) but to only get stuck.

When A = 0 S(x) = Cx + B
Then I can do this by finding the Fourier coefficients(f^h) and so on

When A<0 things become complicated because we get and exponential.

Anyways, first off, how do we know which A to use!? Then I can try to reach some sort of conclusion.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


first, the best thing is to solve it using separation of variable i.e. as an ODE as u did

u get X''(x)-CX(x)=0 and T'(t)-CT=0

i think ur missing something in the given such as u(0,t)=u(2\pi,t)
if so the solution would be X''(x)+L^2X(x)=0
X(x)=Acos(Lx)+Bsin(Lx)
with L=-n^2*(pi)^2/(2pi)^2

the solution would be the sum of X_n(x)*T_n(t)
 


No I'm not missing anything in the solution. That's the problem. If the constraints on the extremities of x were there it would be a piece of cake. And if we had them then there would be no need for f to be belong to C or PS. Even in the question it tells us to solve the PDE using Fourier series.
 


Thanks but I found the answer to this. I think this is done.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K