Peak impact force of a falling object

Cornish30
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

I'm trying to work out how much force is produced if a climber was to fall onto a rope.

I do realize that it would depend on the rope and whether it stretched or not but for this case let's just say it does not have any give in it.

If I use the example of a climb who weighs 80kg, he falls 8m and takes 1.5 seconds can we/I work out the force which is felt?

With my research I have found out that...
Force = Mass X Acceleration
Velocity/ Speed = Distance / Time
Kinetic energy = .5(Mass (Velocity X Velocity))

Can somebody please help me put it all together please??





Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Cornish30! Welcome to PF! :smile:

What level are you at?

Have you done the work-energy theorem?

The force required to stop someone depends on how long in time it takes to stop them, or what distance it takes to stop them …

the more time (or distance) available, the less the force needed. :wink:
 
I'm not a school or college just trying to get a better understanding for my work.

Work-energy theorm!?

All I would like to be able to do is work out how much fore someone or a piece of equipment would feel if they were to fall and suddenly stop.

I know there are lot's of variables but if I know the equations then I can work out different falls.

Does that make sense?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top