Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

B Pedagogy and HUP

  1. Jul 7, 2016 #1
    HUP was taught at least to me, as a brute fact that came into existence when my lecturer wrote it on the board...with chalk.

    I was fortunate enough to have already had some background in Fourier Transforms.

    When doing a basic course on SWE and the link between it and wave solutions, the HUP then seemed obvious and mundane.

    Many students however that had not already studied the FT went into philosophical crisis.

    The solution seems obvious;

    Do not mention the HUP until students have seen a lot of concrete examples of FT's in mundane applications.

    My slogan would be:

    FT's first.....then wave mechanics.....then the HUP.

    Last edited: Jul 7, 2016
  2. jcsd
  3. Jul 8, 2016 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    I agree. :smile:
  4. Jul 8, 2016 #3


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

    In my opinion you should not start teaching QM with wave mechanics but use the representation free approach with the advantage that you can discuss the most simple case of spin-1/2 observables (2D unitary vector space instead of the full separable infinite-dimensional Hilbert space). The HUP just follows from positive definiteness of the scalar product. It's not limited to conjugate pairs of observables and thus not limited to (generalized) Fourier transformations.
  5. Jul 8, 2016 #4

    A. Neumaier

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    But it needs noncommuting oservables.
  6. Jul 8, 2016 #5


    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Just to clarify: SWE = ?
  7. Jul 8, 2016 #6


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

    I referred to the usual Heisenberg-Robertson uncertainty relation which holds for any pair of observables
    $$\Delta A \Delta B \geq \frac{1}{2} |\langle [\hat{A},\hat{B}] \rangle|.$$
    If the observables ##A## and ##B## are compatible, i.e., if the corresponding representing self-adjoint operators ##\hat{A}## and ##\hat{B}## commute, of course, there's no restriction by the uncertainty relation, i.e., you can prepare the system in states, where both observables have determined values (represented, e.g., by a common eigenvector of the operators).
  8. Jul 8, 2016 #7
    Schrödinger wave equation.
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted