Penalty points to birthdays ratio

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Points Ratio
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a mathematical formula relating to penalty points and birthdays, specifically focusing on the variable k in the equation P = kN. The conversation humorously touches on the age of a member, cyrusabdollahi, and the implications of age in social contexts. There are playful exchanges about marital status and the perception of elderly individuals, particularly highlighting the discrimination faced by those over 100 years old. Participants express concern over societal attitudes towards aging, suggesting a cultural bias against the elderly. The dialogue also references historical calendar changes and their impact on age recognition, emphasizing a broader critique of how society values different age groups.
Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
8,194
Reaction score
2,528
N = (number of birthdays per year at PF) - 1
P = penalty points assigned

What should be the value of k where P = kN?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
if N=1; k=0
else, k=\infty

Yes yes I know, I can't program, its the effect that counts..
 
What? I don't get it.
 
Today - cyrusabdollahi (87) - he may be the oldest member. :smile:
 
Astronuc said:
Today - cyrusabdollahi (87) - he may be the oldest member. :smile:

If he wasn't that old, I wouldn't marry someone else!o:)
 
Last edited:
Lisa! said:
If he wasn't that old, I wouldn't marry someone else!o:)

I'm not sure what this means. Anyway, what's the status of our marriage, Lisa? Are we still married? I haven't been paying attention.
 
If you're not having sex, you're probably still married.
 
Danger said:
If you're not having sex, you're probably still married.

I don't have any idea if we are. If you recall, I was the last one to find out we were married. I don't mind, I just need an update now and then.
 
A far more important issue is that 107-year olds are discriminated against.

The computer has the presumption to regard their birthdays as less valid than others.

This culture of youth terror towards the elderly must be stopped at once.
 
  • #10
zoobyshoe said:
I'm not sure what this means. Anyway, what's the status of our marriage, Lisa? Are we still married? I haven't been paying attention.


How am I supposed to know? :confused:
 
  • #11
arildno said:
A far more important issue is that 107-year olds are discriminated against.

The computer has the presumption to regard their birthdays as less valid than others.

This culture of youth terror towards the elderly must be stopped at once.

The discrimination against 254-year-old Americans born from Sep 3 to Sep 13 easily eclipses that. It's like all of those folks were wiped completely off the slate of history. You can't even find dead 254-year-old Americans born on those dates.
 
  • #12
I detect an unwholesome Amero-centrism in your criticism, BobG.
 
  • #13
Lisa! said:
How am I supposed to know? :confused:

Read your tea leaves or something.
 
  • #14
Are we still married?
zoobyshoe said:
I haven't been paying attention.

Lisa! said:
How am I supposed to know?
Sounds like you're still married. :smile:
 
  • #15
arildno said:
I detect an unwholesome Amero-centrism in your criticism, BobG.
I second that. They had Gregorian calendars (from Sep 14, 1752) all over the British Empire (over which the sun was said to have never set).

PS: It's a good thing the French didn't adopt the Gregorian calendar immediately, or we would have lost Legendre to the vicissitudes of time. :biggrin:
 
Last edited:
Back
Top