Pendulum mechanics and coherence

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the relationship between pendulum mechanics and the concept of coherence, particularly in a system of multiple pendulums as harmonic oscillators. It suggests that at maximum potential energy, the molecular vibrations of the pendulum material become more random and "incoherent," while at maximum kinetic energy, they align into a more "coherent" state. The conversation also touches on the idea that the supporting rod's material experiences a similar transition between random motion and shared stress during oscillation. Additionally, the relationship between coherence and entropy is examined, raising questions about how entropy is measured in a pendulum's dynamic state. Overall, the dialogue seeks to establish a framework for understanding these oscillations in terms of coherence and incoherence.
BaghdadSerai
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Is there an established context in which the oscillation of a pendulum between potential and kinetic forms of energy can be described in term of coherence, that is, viewed as an oscillation between coherence and incoherence? (here incoherence is taken as the antonym of coherence)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not a single pendulum, but a collection of pendulums (harmonic oscillators). Coherence is a statistical measure of a system.
 
I don't want to force one notion upon another, but it seems one could make a case for this view. At maximum potential the molecular vibrations of the pendulum material would be statistically more random, "incoherent"; at kinetic maximum they would share a single vector of motion, statistically be more "coherent". In addition, the material of the supporting rod, at the micro level, would cycle between an unconstrained random motion at the point of maximum potential and transition into a state of mitigating shared stress (perhaps a form of coherence) at kinetic maximum.
Thanks for your reply.
 
By your reasoning, the entropy of a freely oscillating pendulum will also oscillate in magnitude. Is that permissible?
 
Oh, entropy! Good question. I know entropy to be a state function at thermodynamic equilibrium, wherein the energy is evenly dispersed among the various micro-states of the system. I believe there would be a relationship between coherence within a system and the number of micro-states that could serve as storage modes for energy. I am uncertain as to how it is entropy is measured in pendulum's dynamic.
Again, thanks.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top