Percent% Errror Quoted for Electrical Components. What is it?

AI Thread Summary
Manufacturers quote a percent error for electrical components to indicate the variation from nominal values, with a 5% error suggesting that parts are within 5% of the specified value. The distribution of these errors can vary, potentially being Gaussian or flat, depending on the manufacturing process and whether parts are tested. Higher tolerance components, like 2% resistors, are not simply subsets of 5% resistors, as different series exist with varying nominal values. The quality of manufacturing and testing processes significantly impacts the actual distribution of component values. Understanding these factors is crucial for accurate application in electrical engineering.
Phrak
Messages
4,266
Reaction score
7
Errror Quoted for Electrical Components. What is it?

(Where do I post electrical engineering homework questions? I'm home. I'm working. OK, maybe I'm not really working.)

Manufacturers quote a percent variation from nominal value for their parts. What does this percent error even mean??

For a 5% error, does this mean that each and every part is within 5% of the quoted value. Is the distributions flat, or is it Gaussian in shape?

If the manufacturer also sells a 2% version, does this mean that the 5% parts will have the middle 2% missing as these parts are selected-out?
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org


Phrak said:
(Where do I post electrical engineering homework questions? I'm home. I'm working. OK, maybe I'm not really working.)

Manufacturers quote a percent variation from nominal value for their parts. What does this percent error even mean??

For a 5% error, does this mean that each and every part is within 5% of the quoted value. Is the distributions flat, or is it Gaussian in shape?

If the manufacturer also sells a 2% version, does this mean that the 5% parts will have the middle 2% missing as these parts are selected-out?

I believe that if you're quoted 5%, the manufacturer guarantees that the resistors are within 5% of the nominal value (at some given temperature)--otherwise, they'd go into the next resistor size! I seem to always get better though.

The reason you don't see the 2% chopped out of the 5% (and the 1% chopped out of the 2%, and so forth) is that resistors are sold in various series. There are more 2% nominal resistor values available (E48) as opposed to 5% (E24) and 10% (E12):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preferred_number

With better manufacturing tolerances, you can always sell higher-tolerance resistors as lower ones.
 


MATLABdude said:
I believe that if you're quoted 5%, the manufacturer guarantees that the resistors are within 5% of the nominal value (at some given temperature)--otherwise, they'd go into the next resistor size! I seem to always get better though.

The reason you don't see the 2% chopped out of the 5% (and the 1% chopped out of the 2%, and so forth) is that resistors are sold in various series. There are more 2% nominal resistor values available (E48) as opposed to 5% (E24) and 10% (E12):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preferred_number

With better manufacturing tolerances, you can always sell higher-tolerance resistors as lower ones.

That makes some sense. It may depend on the manufacturing process; upon whether a part is tested or not. Without testing, periodic process checks would be preformed to see that process parameters are within limits, such that tolerance limits are met in the final product. In this case you'd expect a small fraction of items to leak outside the tolerence limits. So the curve might be more or less a normal distribution. With 100% testing, those that exceed spec would be kicked out. In this case the distribution would be normal, with the tails of the curve truncated.

It also depends on the quality of the people. I've worked for some crap companies, whos specs were bogus.

But this is a lot of semi-educated guess-work on my part. Wish I knew better.
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...
Back
Top