Perfect Method to Answer a Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chewy0087
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Method
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on strategies for tackling difficult structured questions, particularly in the context of aptitude tests for physics. Participants emphasize the importance of approaching challenging problems methodically. Key strategies include breaking down the question algebraically, identifying related formulas, and drawing on past experiences with similar questions. The ability to recognize one's own knowledge gaps is also highlighted as crucial for effective problem-solving. The conversation suggests that a strong foundation in related scientific concepts can aid in navigating tricky questions, and that practice and familiarity with various problem types enhance analytical skills. Overall, the emphasis is on developing a systematic approach to problem-solving in academic settings.
Chewy0087
Messages
368
Reaction score
0
Hey there, been wondering about this for quite a while now, sorry if it's in the wrong section;

What's the perfect way to answer a difficult structured question?

I'm talking about long difficult intuitive questions here, which occurred to me when I was trying some of the past Aptitude Tests for Oxford undergraduate physics.

Doing almost all of the paper I was lucky in that I've read into different bits of science not at all related to the syllabus so I was able to answer a lot of the 'tricky' ones which would be very challenging had you not known the specific way to look at the question/formula.

So say you see a difficult question and you think, i have no idea how to answer this, but you had to give it a go (without researching) how would you go about it? I mean, try and write out the problem algebraically? Look for related formulas? Try and related to past questions you've seen? I'm genuinely interested to hear how people solve problems, I seem to simply stumble onto answers or not find them at all, although given enough time I can usually get my head around them.

I'm looking particularly for advice from people who're taking/have taken degree's and who're very good at analysing& solving problems. Any help is appreciated.

Sorry for the huge paragraph =P
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think more people would be on the same page if you specify the type of question (physics, math, how to get to Y from X) because I think this seems too general of a question to ask. Personally, I think you have to have a good sense of 'how much' you don't know about the question if that is describable in an appropriate fashion here.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top