Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Perigee Apogee Ratio

  1. Feb 16, 2007 #1
    A satellite, placed into the Earth's orbit to investigate the ionosphere, had the following orbit parameters: perigee, 475 km; apogee, 2265 km (both distances above the Earth's surface); period, 112.7 min. Find the ratio vp/va of the speed at perigee to that at apogee.

    I was told by someone that this ratio is equal to the inverse ratio of the distances. But the period is thrown in so I have no idea where to start on this one. I know this follows an elliptical shape but I still can't think of where to begin.

    Can anyone give a first couple of steps to get me started?
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 16, 2007 #2
    Google Keplers laws of motion. He found that equal orbital areas are swept in equal time, and developed the math to explain it. Which still hols up well, unless looking at Mercury, but thats a later chapter.
  4. Feb 16, 2007 #3
    ive done reasearch and i have notes but i cant seem to apply it properly, only post plz if u can give me a concrete path to take or equation to use
  5. Feb 16, 2007 #4
    Ok, if the research didn't help, try the following, assume that in both cases, that the orbit is circular where v^2/r=g. What results do you get for v in both cases?
  6. Feb 16, 2007 #5
    v = sqrt(gr)

    but then the ratio would be equal to sqrt(r1)/sqrt(r2) since g cancels,
    is this right?
  7. Feb 16, 2007 #6
    Post some numbers.
  8. Feb 16, 2007 #7
    Vp/Va = sqrt(2265)/sqrt(475)
    = 2.184

    but sum1 told me before that
    Vp/Va = 2265/475 (inverse ratio)

    but i dont kno why the period is not a factor
  9. Feb 16, 2007 #8
    because g is not constant. You need to correct for that first.
  10. Feb 16, 2007 #9
    o ya oops i forgot
  11. Feb 16, 2007 #10
    i kno ur not supposed to give ppl direct answers on this, but im super frustrated with this question so could sumbody please give me a big boost,
    like just explain wut need to be equated together cuz all the hints make me more confused and with planetary motion there are too many equations and its rough enough trying to simplify them
    i dont mind working hard for this question but i just need a good foundation to work with
  12. Feb 16, 2007 #11
  13. Feb 16, 2007 #12
    ok ive seen the equations for kepplers laws, i just dont know where to get the velocity out of it
    i know there is the equation with the squared equal to the cubed
    but i have no clue where to get the velocity into the picture,
    also do i need to find the eccentricity first
  14. Feb 17, 2007 #13
    sum1 please tell me the first few steps to follow in roder to solve this
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook