Period of Small Oscillations for Rigid Body Pendulum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the period of small oscillations for a rigid body pendulum consisting of a light rod and two identical spheres. The user initially applies the parallel axis theorem incorrectly, leading to the same period for both oscillation scenarios, which is not valid. A suggestion is made to ensure that the measurement is taken from the pivot point rather than the center of the spheres. The importance of correctly identifying the axis of rotation is emphasized, as it affects the calculations. Clarifying these points is crucial for obtaining accurate results in the problem.
willisverynic
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A pendulum consists of a light rigid rod of length 250mm, with two identical uniform solid spheres of radius 50mm attached one on either side of its lower end. Find the period of small oscillations (a) perpendicular to the line of centers, and (b) along it.

Homework Equations


Period = 2*pi*sqrt(I/MgR)
Parallel axis theorem: I = Icm + Md^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried simply applying the parallel axis theorem to a ball using Icm = 2/5mr^2 and d = sqrt(.25^2+.05+2) but this yields and incorrect answer. I believe this method would be wrong because it would give the same answer for both parts, which is not the case

Thanks

ps not sure if this belongs in advanced or not
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi willisverynic! welcome to pf! :smile:

(try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)
willisverynic said:
I tried simply applying the parallel axis theorem to a ball using Icm = 2/5mr^2 and d = sqrt(.25^2+.05+2) but this yields and incorrect answer. I believe this method would be wrong because it would give the same answer for both parts, which is not the case

i suspect you're measuring from the pivot point rather from than the axis

the axis of rotation is through the pivot point, either North or East …

the parallel axis is through the centre of one sphere, and the distance between the two axes does depend on which way round they are :wink:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top