Perpetual Motion: Can the Student's Idea Work?

AI Thread Summary
The concept of a perpetual motion machine proposed by the student, which involves using an electric fan to power a wind generator, is fundamentally flawed due to the laws of thermodynamics. Energy losses occur through friction in both the fan and generator, converting kinetic energy into heat, which is not harnessed back into the system. Additionally, the wind generated may not travel efficiently enough to maintain the necessary energy output. Resistance in the wiring further diminishes the energy available to sustain the system. Ultimately, no system can achieve 100% efficiency, making perpetual motion impossible.
dajugganaut
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Question:

A student once came up with an idea for a perpetual motion machine. His idea was as follows: Point an electric fan at a wind generator. Blow on the blades of the wind generator to activate it. As the generator produces electricity, it is used to ppower the electric gan which in turn keeps the generator going which in turn keeps the fan going...etc. Once set in motion, it would keep going forever until you stopped it.

would this work? please explain why or why not
(well of couse not, but please explain)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider, is there any system that is 100% efficent?
 
well obviously not, but what exactly is the flaw in this perpetual motion that would make it not work??
 
dajugganaut said:
well obviously not, but what exactly is the flaw in this perpetual motion that would make it not work??
Well I can think of many many flaws in that system. Try and think where energy would be lost.
 
friction for both the fan and the wind generator, but i cannot see exactly /how/ its lost
 
dajugganaut said:
friction for both the fan and the wind generator, but i cannot see exactly /how/ its lost
Well friction turns the kenetic energy in the system to heat. Is that heat then used in the system or just wasted?

Also would the wind travel the whole distance and be 100% effective?

Think also abour the resistance in the wires.
 
ok, i see your point zurtex, thanks!
 
Back
Top