Understanding Perturbation Theory and Spin in Quantum Mechanics

1Kris
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
In my quest to learn quantum mechanics I've become a little confused and I have a question.
It is "In The Feynman Lectures on Physics Volume 3, is most of the work, eg. ammonia molecule done using perturbation theory or is this method something else, not perturbation theory?"
I started to learn a little about perturbation theory elsewhere, and it seemed similar but not quite the same, so I'm a little foggy about this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1Kris said:
In my quest to learn quantum mechanics I've become a little confused and I have a question.
It is "In The Feynman Lectures on Physics Volume 3, is most of the work, eg. ammonia molecule done using perturbation theory or is this method something else, not perturbation theory?"
I started to learn a little about perturbation theory elsewhere, and it seemed similar but not quite the same, so I'm a little foggy about this.

I'm sorry, but I'm not sure what it is that you're asking?
 
In the Feynman Lectures on Physics, Volume 3, Feynman uses a an approximation of treating systems as two state systems. Is this the same as perturbation theory, or is it a different method?
 
1Kris said:
In the Feynman Lectures on Physics, Volume 3, Feynman uses a an approximation of treating systems as two state systems. Is this the same as perturbation theory, or is it a different method?

I think the best answer, infuriating as it may be, is "yes".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perturbation_theory

You can see there are elements of it there, but it's not a pure treatment for the reasons you mention, I think.
 
Haha thanks for that, why infuriating?
 
1Kris said:
Haha thanks for that, why infuriating?

Generally people finding that the answer is "yes" to a yes or no question is infuriating. I'm glad you don't! :)
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top