Pervect's discussion re photon/light perspective/reference frame

[Usaf Moji]

Hi Pervect,

You concluded the thread titled “Another question about photon perspective, concerning entanglement” initiated by Anticitizen with this post:

Perhaps I'm a bit irritable today, but I'm formulating a new policy - we'll see how it goes. When I see the words "photon perspective" in a thread, I'm going to make a quick note that a photon doesn't have a perspective, refer people to the previous discussion on the issue, and lock the thread.
__________________
Perv, High-tech dimension where Magik and technology are equal... Pervects are short-tempered and disquieting rumors circulate about them, which Pervects encourage so that people don't visit. Don't ever call them Perverts.

You also concluded the thread titled “Reference frame of Light” initiated by Klotz with this post:

In accordance with my new policy, I'm pointing out that light does not have a reference frame, and locking the thread...
__________________
Perv, High-tech dimension where Magik and technology are equal... Pervects are short-tempered and disquieting rumors circulate about them, which Pervects encourage so that people don't visit. Don't ever call them Perverts.

I am having difficulty finding the “previous discussion on the issue” that you mentioned in the first post. Your assistance in locating this thread would be appreciated, as it sounds interesting.

Thanks.

 

[jtbell]

Tip: Google is much better than this forum's own search feature. Just add "site:physicsforums.com" to whatever you're searching for. For example:

http://www.google.com/search?q=photon+perspective+site:physicsforums.com

http://www.google.com/search?q=photon+reference+frame+site:physicsforums.com

This subject has come up many times on PF.

 

[Entropia]

Hi there,

I understand your frustration with the lack of a clear explanation or previous discussion on the topic of photon perspective and reference frames. I believe Pervect's intention in locking the thread is to avoid repeating the same discussion that has already taken place in previous threads. However, I also agree that it would be helpful to have a reference to these previous discussions for those who are interested in learning more about the topic.

I suggest reaching out to Pervect directly for clarification on the previous discussions and for any resources or threads that may be helpful in understanding the concept better. I'm sure Pervect would be happy to assist and share their knowledge on the subject.