PF Betterment Survey Staff Responses

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The PF Betterment survey received over 200 responses, prompting staff to address key feedback for community improvement. Civility is emphasized as essential for a diverse membership, with staff committing to act on unfriendly behavior. Members are encouraged to use the report link for various issues, fostering community responsibility. Enhancements include clearer thread prefixes and improved messaging for thread closures to reduce confusion. A new DIY/Projects forum has been added in response to member suggestions, with guidelines provided for its use.
Messages
19,773
Reaction score
10,726
Thank you for your over 200 responses to our PF Betterment survey. They contained valuable feedback that will improve your experience here. I have started to organize feedback and the staff has begun to discuss important or commonly expressed feedback. To return the favor of your feedback we decided to give a public response regarding our discussion on an issue if we feel it will be helpful. This thread will remain closed for comments to remain efficient. Feel free to create a new thread in feedback with your question or comment. Here we go!

Issue #1: Community Civility and Reporting

Overall
Physics Forums must be grounded in civility. We have members from across the globe, guests from literally every nation on earth, ages spanning 8+ decades, with expertise in dozens of fields and we all must act civil to each other. We don't have to agree or even like each other, but we must act civil. Going forward staff will be acting more often on behavior that is unfriendly and unwelcoming. PF must be a force for good. We're in this together. Below is a reminder of our values. Remember them every time you post.

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and correct spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience and diplomacy while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Honest recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and cooperative problem solving

Reporting
We've had some confusion on the purpose of the report link available under each post. PF averages hundreds of posts a day and PF staff consists of only about 20 members. We work incredibly hard, but we can't review all posts. We encourage members to click the report link for a post/thread that they feel should be looked at. This can be for any number of reasons. It's just a way to notify us to take a look. Being part of a community means you help take responsibility for it. It's no different than the communities you are apart of in the real world. In the real world if you see an issue you let someone know. Again it's not only about reporting bad behavior. It could be a broken image, a poor thread title, garbled formatting, anything you think staff should know about so we can take a look. Take pride and ownership in our community. Lastly if there is bad behavior or a post that gets you riled up we ask you not douse more fuel to the fire by replying in a less than civil manner. It's best to report and walk away. Let us handle it :smile:

That's it for the first issue. I will be back in a few days with the next one.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara, Poetria, Terrell and 21 others
Physics news on Phys.org
Issue #2: Thread Level Prefixes

A couple years ago we introduced thread level prefixes in several forum categories as an attempt to offer greater clarity as to what level the thread starter wants discussion be at. We decided to use one letter prefixes for compaction and title alignment. The drawback is that it's not always descriptive as to what they are on initial viewing. To help make it more clear we've added a mouse over tooltip at the thread list level.

note: I'm still working on changing the prefix filter at the top
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Math Amateur, CDL, Imager and 17 others
Issue #3: Thread Closure Messaging

Through the survey we've been informed that our moderation and closure messaging is confusing. To help increase clarity we will promise to make a better effort in providing more detail as to why a thread has been closed. Furthermore when we use the "closed for moderation" message we will provide more detail in why it's closed for moderation and an approximate window when the thread will reopen. If you see a "closed for moderation" message that hasn't been updated for 24 hours or an ambiguous "thread closed" message please report it and we'll take a look. Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes DrGreg, Charles Link, phinds and 1 other person
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
This came up in my job today (UXP). Never thought to raise it here on PF till now. Hyperlinks really should be underlined at all times. PF only underlines them when they are rolled over. Colour alone (especially dark blue/purple) makes it difficult to spot a hyperlink in a large block of text (or even a small one). Not everyone can see perfectly. Even if they don't suffer from colour deficiency, not everyone has the visual acuity to distinguish two very close shades of text. Hover actions...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...

Similar threads

Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
103
Views
15K
Replies
63
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top