PF5 Problems & Errors: Report & Discuss

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
This discussion focuses on reporting various errors and functional problems with PF5. Users have noted issues with the messaging system, including incorrect alert counts on the bell icon and problems with MathJax when editing posts containing LaTeX code. There are also concerns about the mobile view being limited to a single column, which affects usability on larger screens. Additionally, users reported missing features like the post count and the option to set titles and descriptions for media uploads. Overall, the thread serves as a platform for users to highlight these issues while the site undergoes improvements.
  • #301
Just restarted my computer also, with no effect.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #302
fresh_42 said:
These are mine:
View attachment 247035
at least here.:oldconfused:
That's what I get as well, under Firefox on a Windows 7 workstation. Same as I've always seen since the new system was installed except that the last one, "skeptical", is new
 
  • #303
StatGuy2000 said:
Hi @Greg Bernhardt . I was trying to use the Search advanced feature to find threads where 2 (or more) PF members have contributed.

However, every time I enter 2 PFS member names, (under "Posted by:" with PFS Member X and Member Y) I only see cases where posts by Member X or Member Y, not Member X and Member Y. Is there a way to use the AND option in searches?
The software always searches posts. A post is from a single user.
BillTre said:
A link like the above would have expanded after saving the draft and then reopening it, such that the blue covered the whole paragraph it was in as well as neighboring paragraphs.
Messed up BB code somewhere I guess, but hard to diagnose based on that description.

@Greg Bernhardt: I cleared my cache (sort of) and it went from the light bulb to the red downvote icon. It was good before! But after reloading it was good again, just a one-time glitch.
Firefox/windows.
 
  • #304
mfb said:
Messed up BB code somewhere I guess, but hard to diagnose based on that description.
I don't use the BB code, but I suppose I could have hit a button or some keys without noticing.
I will see if it happens again in the future.
 
  • #305
I have the anger icon on a new installed Firefox (W10).
 
  • #307
Here is how Opera displays the png (Chrome has it correct).
If I download the png file as linked, and open it with a graphic program, then the downloaded version are different in Opera and Chrome, too.

1563941285806.png
 
Last edited:
  • #309
Yup, somthin' has a-changed. Old Firefox 43 on Win XP here.
Second icon used to show the lightbulb, now it shows thumbsdown. Hoovering over it shows text 'Informative'. When I click on it, (on Greg's post 306 above) it shows as Red Thumbsdown.

Trying a Copy Image here:
Hmm, it copied the text, not the image. (I'm getting behind, same result after Greg purged the file from CDN and I did a page refresh)

I note that the second emoji has "id=7", the rest are in numeric order
Greg Bernhardt said:
Just did an exhaustive search and that .png file does not reside on this computer, even though I've used a couple Likes in this session.
 
  • #312
OOPS! the repeat only shows up in the local edit window; not in what gets posted.

PLEASE IGNORE, OR DELETE, THIS AND THE TWO PRIOR POSTS.o:)
 
  • #313
BillTre said:
But is still labelled informative if you hover over it.
Yes, the labels are the same as before.
fresh_42 said:
I get those with Opera! (Haven't installed Firefox here.)
The interesting fact is, I am not getting the red icons from Chrome on my laptop (Win 10, the latest version of chrome). The screenshot that I posted was from Chrome on Android.
Greg Bernhardt said:
Clear your browser caches
I see the red icons on Android even after clearing cache and cookies.
Greg Bernhardt said:
From laptop, I am seeing the yellow icons, but from Android, I am seeing the red icons, same as what @fresh_42 posted in #307.

Everything was tried on Chrome, no other browser was used.
 
  • #314
Greg Bernhardt said:
No changes in Opera. The "like" I set was said "informative" with "thumb down" shown, and the "download linked content" led to the wrong png file, too, displayed by an image program, no browser.

I think the file is not what makes the difference, it is the interpreters which do. Can you post the file as an attachment rather than a link? I would like to see what happens if I download the file without being interpreted by the browser first and see what happens.

The only solution I see is, either to change the two icons into something which is not interpreted differently or to drop them. Of course I don't know whether this is a "quickly done" or "impossible" change.
 
  • #315
fresh_42 said:
No changes in Opera. The "like" I set was said "informative" with "thumb down" shown, and the "download linked content" led to the wrong png file, too, displayed by an image program, no browser.

When you click the CDN link, you see a image with the "thumbs down" icon?

fresh_42 said:
I think the file is not what makes the difference, it is the interpreters which do.

What is an interpreter?
 
  • Skeptical
Likes fresh_42
  • #316
Greg Bernhardt said:
When you click the CDN link, you see a image with the "thumbs down" icon?
Yes.
 
  • #317
I know the issue, should be fixed now
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Love
Likes Wrichik Basu, BillTre and fresh_42
  • #318
Greg Bernhardt said:
When you click the CDN link, you see a image with the "thumbs down" icon?
When I click the link then I use the browser as image viewer, and all is as described: correct in chrome (W10), wrong in Opera. I wanted to test the file itself.
What is an interpreter?
The various browsers. They interpret the code line by line, or meanwhile tag by tag, in contrast to a program which needs a compiled code and executes the compilation.

App.:
Back in Chrome to see what my "informative" did here.
The good news is, it is shown as "informative" on this platform.
The bad news is, it shows "Tom G" as the one who set the mark, not me.
 
  • #319
Fixed in Opera and Firefox, and the marks carry the correct author "you" now.✌

:bow:

:partytime:
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre and Greg Bernhardt
  • #320
Greg Bernhardt said:
I know the issue, should be fixed now
Just out of curiosity, where was the issue?
 
  • #321
Wrichik Basu said:
Just out of curiosity, where was the issue?
I upgraded PFs core software a few days ago, it overwrote the custom reaction image.
 
  • Like
Likes dlgoff and Wrichik Basu
  • #322
fresh_42 said:
The bad news is, it shows "Tom G" as the one who set the mark, not me.
I'm hiding everywhere[/size].
(And didn't even know it! What a waste. :oldbiggrin:)
 
  • Like
Likes fresh_42
  • #323
  • #324
Looks like the same to me, just with and without About information given.
 
  • #325
Tom.G said:
When viewing a particular members Information page, clicking on the "About" button brings up the "Conversation" window, not the About window.

This does not occur with all members. It does occur here:
https://www.physicsforums.com/members/kenny1999.209603/#about
I get the same thing. No "about" and a link to start a conversation
 
  • #326
phinds said:
I get the same thing. No "about" and a link to start a conversation
Yes, since there is no About information entered and the conversation button is always there.
 
  • Informative
Likes phinds
  • #327
fresh_42 said:
Yes, since there is no About information entered and the conversation button is always there.
Ah ha.
 
  • #328
fresh_42 said:
Yes, since there is no About information entered and the conversation button is always there.
OKaay... try this logically similar situtation.
Three Four push buttons on a panel, labelled Up, Down, Pause, Fire.
You push the Pause button.
The Pause function is not implemented.
What random function should be activated?
 
  • #329
Tom.G said:
OKaay... try this logically similar situtation.
Three Four push buttons on a panel, labelled Up, Down, Pause, Fire.
You push the Pause button.
The Pause function is not implemented.
What random function should be activated?
I don't understand this comparison. The About button does what it does with every user. Some have disclosed personal information, other have not. Thus it is empty. At the bottom of the About page is always the "Start Conversation" option. Well, not always. I couldn't start a conversation with myself.
 
  • #330

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K