theman408 said:
What's the difference between [phasor voltage and the voltage RMS value]?
Voltage phasor
By using Euler's Formula, the voltage can be expressed as
[tex]V = V_{0} \:cos(\omega t + \phi)= Re[V_{0}\:e^{j(\omega t + \phi)}]=Re[V_{0}\:e^{j\phi}e^{j \omega t}]=Re[\bar{V}e^{j \omega t}][/tex]
where [tex]\bar{V}= V_{0}\:e^{j \phi}[/tex] is known as the phasor.
In effect you have factored out the time-dependency, and you're left with a representation (the phasor) of voltage that only deals with the static quantities of amplitude and phase angle of the cosine function. Being able to represent voltage this way simplifies a lot of calculations, e.g. addition of two sinusoidally time-varying functions (of the same frequency) is reduced from a trigonometric problem to a simple algebraic problem. To sneak back into the time-domain, you just shamelessly tack on the [tex]e^{j \omega t}[/tex] to your result. Good stuff!
RMS Value
If you combine the fact that 1) when dealing with ac power, you're usually interested in the average value of power during each cycle of the waveform, with 2) power is proportional to the voltage squared, you get
[tex]{V_{rms}}^2=\frac{V_{0}^{2}}{T}\int^{T}_{0}cos^{2}(\omega t) dt = \frac{V_{0}^{2}}{T}\int^{T}_{0}1+cos(2\:\omega t) dt = \frac{V_{0}^{2}}{2}[/tex]
Or
[tex]V_{rms}=\frac{V_{0}}{\sqrt{2}}[/tex]EDIT: For some reason I can't edit the tex code to correct the missing 1/2 factor. It's supposed to be
[tex]\frac{V_{0}^{2}}{T}\int^{T}_{0}\frac{1}{2}+\frac{cos(2\:\omega t)}{2}\:dt[/tex]