Programs PhD programs -- I’m interested in both astrophysics and AMO physics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the decision between pursuing a PhD in astrophysics or AMO (Atomic, Molecular, and Optical) physics. The key point is that the choice should be influenced by the specific research projects and skills developed during the PhD rather than just the subfield itself. Engaging in projects that utilize data analysis or machine learning in astrophysics can lead to diverse career opportunities in tech industries, while observational work may align more with medical imaging. The conversation emphasizes the importance of examining graduate programs and their alumni outcomes to gauge potential career paths. Job prospects for AMO physics graduates tend to be more defined and aligned with industry needs compared to those in astrophysics, where career paths can be more varied. Overall, the focus should be on personal interests in research topics and the practical applications of the skills gained during the PhD.
shja
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone, l have a situation and l thought you could help me. Actually, l live in the U.S. and want to apply for several phd programs, but I’m interested in both astrophysics and AMO physics, and l can’t decide which track l should pursue a phd in. I’ve talked to several professors from my department and all of them told me to do the one which interests me more, but for me both are equally the same, so l want to ask u which one has more ongoing active research? I know some people in astronomy would say that I might not end up doing something related to this field, how about AMO? what does the future path of AMO or Astro look like? what are some other job titles rather than academia (for both of them)? (I know that I should never choose one because I want to pursue a career in academia but it’s always important to have a general idea about the outcome and please give me a straight answer and don’t say the one which interests you more! and I prefer to do research in observa. Astro and experimental AMO)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I may not be in the best position to comment on ongoing research in astro and AMO, but one thing to point out is that a lot about your future career prospects (academic or otherwise) can actually come down to the details of the problem that you work on for your PhD, rather than the subfield itself.

For example, if you go into astrophysics and do your PhD on a project where you develop a neural network for combing through a particular data set to search for evidence of extra-solar planets, that kind of work can potentially open up a lot of options in the data-mining and machine learning industries. Whereas if your project is more on the observational side and involves image filtering and processing, there may be more options for you in research and development areas of medical imaging companies.

So I don't know if this helps you, but you might want to think a little about the types of problems or projects that you enjoy working on and the skills that you want to develop over the course of the PhD. Look into the graduate programs that you're interested in. Many will keep and publish some kind of "where are they now" data, so prospective students can see where their graduates are ending up. Looking at the details like this is probably going to give you more of what you want than an answer like "go into AMO physics because there are more industrial applications."
 
  • Like
Likes Dr. Courtney
thank you Choppy; could you please tell me some of the job titles for both of them? to be honest I’ve heard that people with a background in condensed matter or AMO will find a lot of jobs related to their field or similar to their research while other people may do something completely different (like hep-th, hep-ex, or Astro) or better to say Applied careers are well defined in industry rather than a pure subfield.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
222
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top