[PhD Qualifier] Hockey puck friction

  • Thread starter Thread starter confuted
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction
confuted
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
This one seems like it should be easy, not sure where the trouble is.

Homework Statement



A circular ice rink lies in a horizontal plane. A puck of mass M is propelled from point A along the rail of the ice rink so that the puck moves in a circular path. The magnitude of the initial tangential velocity is v_0. The rail exerts a frictional force \mu F_c on the puck causing the velocity v(t) to decrease with time, t. The magnitude of the centripeal force is F_c and \mu is the coefficient of friction between the puck and the rail. The radius of the ice rink is R. Assume there is no friction between the puck and the ice.

a) Calculate the speed v(t) of the puck.
b) Calculate the total distance the puck will travel from t=0 to t=\infty, i.e. s=\int_0^\infty v(t)dt

Homework Equations



a_c=\frac{v(t)^2}{R}

The Attempt at a Solution



F_f=\mu F_c=\mu M a_c = \frac{\mu M v^2}{R}
\frac{dv}{dt}=-a_f=-\frac{F_f}{M}=-\frac{\mu v^2}{R}
\frac{dv}{v^2}=-\frac{\mu dt}{R}
\int_{v0}^{v}\frac{dv}{v^2}=-\int_0^t\frac{\mu dt}{R}
\frac{1}v-\frac{1}{v_0}=\frac{\mu t}{R}
v=\frac{R v_0}{R+\mu v_0 t}

Now this result must be incorrect, because
s=\int_0^{\infty}{\frac{R v_0}{R+\mu v_0 t}dt}=\frac{R}{\mu}\ln(R+\mu v_0 t)=\infty ... nonsense

Where did I go wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
confuted said:
Now this result must be incorrect, because
s=\int_0^{\infty}{\frac{R v_0}{R+\mu v_0 t}dt}=\frac{R}{\mu}\ln(R+\mu v_0 t)=\infty ... nonsense

Where did I go wrong?

Hi confuted! :smile:

Looks ok to me …

if the speed goes down by 10, the deceleration goes down by 100 …

why shouldn't it travel infinitely far? :smile:
 
It just seems nonphysical -- are you sure I haven't made some mistake?
 
confuted said:
It just seems nonphysical -- are you sure I haven't made some mistake?

"nonphysical"? …

what about good ol' Newton's first law … isn't that physical??! :smile:

Physical things do carry on for ever unless there's some good reason not to! :biggrin:
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top